From: loc.pham@comcast.net
Date: Tue Dec 12 2006 - 18:44:18 ART
Well said.
There is a 2 weeks feedback on all tested lab for any reason, we are allow to complaint and give any constructive suggestion to the ccielab program.
For me, I note that there is no flat-panel, under-table keyboard and ask the ccie-lab for upgrade. Why not: I am stuck there for 8 hrs, they need to make it comfortable as possible , don't you think ?!!
The thing is, voice to the correct channel, and , some days, it may get fix !
lP
------------------------------------------ Your said -
RE: anybody passed the CCIE r/s exam ? Scott Morris
Reply to sender to list
# From: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>
# To: "'Blastmor'" <alextols@gmail.com>, "'Mike O'" <mikeeo@msn.com>
# Cc: "'ccie >> Cisco certification'" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
# Subject: RE: anybody passed the CCIE r/s exam ?
# Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:44:49 -0500
# Organization: Emanon.com, Inc.
# Reply-to: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>
# Thread-index: AcceJMEPAU3y7I09TkOU9z1TQ0qSqQAADkhA
So allow me to state it in a different way... Sitting here and complaining
back and forth does NOT solve the problem.
Yeah, it doesn't help for someone to tell you to study more, because
everyone knows that! But instead of commisserating with others around here,
each and every one of you who has had mathematical or other difficulties
needs to TELL CISCO ABOUT IT!
If nobody says anything, they (upper management) may not know there are
flaws in the system. If many people start (professionally) complaining
about similar experiences, someone will say "There must be a problem, let's
explore this."
If nobody is willing to take this on, just what kind of expectation can you
have of anything getting better?
Yes, if all the frequency of this stuff occurring is increasing, it sucks.
Sucks bigtime. But if nobody expresses opinions about this to those who
matter and have a stake in making things better, then it doesn't serve any
purpose other than to make ourselves feel a little better that we have found
other people in similar situations.
Whether it's the Assessor or the real lab or someone's practice labs,
sometimes sh#*$ happens. Help make it right.
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
IPExpert VP - Curriculum Development
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
smorris@ipexpert.com
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Blastmor
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 1:10 PM
To: Mike O
Cc: ccie >> Cisco certification
Subject: Re: anybody passed the CCIE r/s exam ?
Guys, that's enough to say shit and common words like "Study hard and
everything will be ok"!
It's really annoying. Everybody knows it and tries to go through the
technologies as much as possible in depth. But the cases like which happened
to Gabriel become more and more frequent. And this is not a candidate
failure as we see but Cisco's. Recently I took the Assessor and Autoverify
said to me that I have missed RIP completely. That was lie! On the contrary
RIP configuration was completely OK. Autoverify said that I missed 'router
rip, ver 2' and so on....
Is it candidate failure too or what?
I hate this fu...ing tool cause it can play evil joke with me.
-- SY, Alexey
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 02 2007 - 07:50:37 ART