From: Plank, Jason (JPlank@concordefs.com)
Date: Tue Dec 12 2006 - 15:03:58 ART
If you are so convinced that you had the correct answers then use a credit
card and request a re-read. Isn't it only 200 bucks?
YOU CAN DO EEEEEIIIIIITTTTTTTTT!
-------------------
Jason Plank, CCIE #16560
Technical Support Architect
101 Bellevue Parkway
Wilmington, DE 19809
E-mail: JPlank@concordefs.com
Phone: 302-793-5913
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Gabriel Nunes
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 12:10 PM
To: Mike O
Cc: jenseike@start.no; swm@emanon.com; joe1265@hotmail.com; sales@kenza.nl;
groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: anybody passed the CCIE r/s exam ?
Man,
I think is better we stop this message... I`m was clear with my points...
That question was a 3 point question and I didn`t find out what was wrong on
my Multicast, Security and BGP session where I got 0% on all of them.
That was the point. Wrong questions and "strange" scores.
Some guys already agreed with me after show my solutions... And others guys
took the same lab and did the same thing and got a different score...
On BGP there were 3 questions, one of 2 points and two of 3 points How can
someone get 28% of 8 points?? 2 of 8 is 25% and 3 of 8 is 37,5%
As I don`t have money to pay the reread I will keep studying more and more
until I pass.
SO LETS STOP THIS CONVERSATION, BECAUSE IT WON`T SOLVE ANY PROBLEM.
On 12/12/06, Mike O <mikeeo@msn.com> wrote:
>
> I have to agree some of the questions are a little crazy and most likely
> will be removed from future tests, but should one question fail you? no
> you
> should be solid in other areas.
>
> But then again one 2 point question can make or break ya :)
>
>
>
>
> >From: "Gabriel Nunes" <gabriel.nunes@gmail.com>
> >Reply-To: "Gabriel Nunes" <gabriel.nunes@gmail.com>
> >To: "Jens Petter" <jenseike@start.no>
> >CC: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>, "Joe Yohannan" <joe1265@hotmail.com
> >,
> > sales@kenza.nl, groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com,
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: Re: anybody passed the CCIE r/s exam ?
> >Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:53:23 -0200
> >
> >Man, I know of this... But I have proves that they do mistakes
> sometimes...
> >I told before in this flow...
> >
> >I already asked for a reread and my score has growth (a lot)
> >There is question asking to store erros in the NVRAM... I opened a TAC
> and
> >they said that this is not possible...
> >We already had a router with ip base IOS...
> >
> >Those examples above are some of many others proving that we are injured
> >sometimes, but I agree that we have to be prepared for everything!
> >
> >I`m not blaming Cisco totally... I`m just saying that we are injured
> >sometimes... With the price we pay to take this test they should be
> PERFECT
> >in my opinion.
> >
> >It is not easy for me to pay $1250,00.
> >
> >
> >On 12/12/06, Jens Petter <jenseike@start.no> wrote:
> > >
> > > Know your stuff, and you will make it anywhere with any type of
> eqipment
> > > and
> > > everything else... I would think that people have not passed because
> >they
> > > where not preapered, not because of ciscos labs or equipment..
> > >
> > > I talked to one guy who got lab with 4 cat`s and he told me the lab
> was
> > > fair, very much duable and he passed... there is no reason that others
> > > shouldn't do the same if they have done their homework...
> > >
> > > In mine mine I think it is good that not that many passes... That
> proves
> > > that cisco has done a good jon keeping this lab the hardest cert out
> >there
> > > and keeping
> > > it valiuable.. If every other people passed, then this certification
> >would
> > > have a problem... I would have been as much worth as an mcse cert...
> > >
> > >
> > > Mvh
> > > Jens Petter Eikeland
> > > Mob 98247550
> > > Hipercom AS
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> > > Scott Morris
> > > Sent: 12. desember 2006 03:29
> > > To: 'Joe Yohannan'; sales@kenza.nl; groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com;
> > > ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: RE: anybody passed the CCIE r/s exam ?
> > >
> > > The format should be the same all around the world. India lab doesn't
> > > have
> > > local equipment anyway, it's remote-access to one of the other labs.
> > >
> > > Perhaps it's merely an indication that people fear change and freak
> out
> > > about things? Or simply that some of the L2 stuff being focussed on
> is
> > > not
> > > what people taking the lab are prepared for?
> > >
> > >
> > > Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
> >JNCIE
> > > #153, CISSP, et al.
> > > CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
> > > IPExpert VP - Curriculum Development
> > > IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> > > smorris@ipexpert.com
> > > http://www.ipexpert.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Joe Yohannan [mailto:joe1265@hotmail.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 8:14 PM
> > > To: swm@emanon.com; sales@kenza.nl; groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com;
> > > ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: RE: anybody passed the CCIE r/s exam ?
> > >
> > > 4 switches campared to 2 doesn't worry me.
> > >
> > > What does worry me is barely anyone has been passing since 11/13...
> > >
> > > I believe they have only gone through 50 numbers since then. That
> > > includes
> > > numbers for the other tracks and India still using old lab format.
> > > (according to some one that posted here anyway) Prior to 11/13, they
> >were
> > > going through 100 numbers a month.
> > >
> > > - Joe Yo
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>
> > > >Reply-To: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>
> > > >To: "'Kenza@kenza.nl'" <sales@kenza.nl>, <groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com
> >,
> > >
> > > > <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > >Subject: RE: anybody passed the CCIE r/s exam ?
> > > >Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:50:50 -0500
> > > >
> > > >And if you prepare your mind for the complexity, you may be
> pleasantly
> > > >surprised if it's simple.
> > > >
> > > >And just because there are four switches doesn't mean the particular
> > > >lab you have is that tough with it.
> > > >
> > > >As Tony said, same technology different layout.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
> > > >JNCIE #153, CISSP, et al.
> > > >CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
> > > >IPExpert VP - Curriculum Development
> > > >IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> > > >smorris@ipexpert.com
> > > >http://www.ipexpert.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> > > >Kenza@kenza.nl
> > > >Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 7:45 AM
> > > >To: groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > >Subject: Re: anybody passed the CCIE r/s exam ?
> > > >
> > > >yes i know, but it get complex when you have 3 or 4 switches, more
> > > >diffuclties then when you have just 2 switches.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > >From: "Tony Schaffran" <groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com>
> > > >To: "'Kenza@kenza.nl'" <sales@kenza.nl>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > >Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 1:35 PM
> > > >Subject: RE: anybody passed the CCIE r/s exam ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > No need to get hung up on the actual number of switches.
> > > > >
> > > > > Spanning-tree is the same regardless if there are 2 switches or
> 20.
> > > > >
> > > > > Focus on the technology and you will pass.
> > > > >
> > > > > Tony Schaffran
> > > > > Network Analyst
> > > > > CCIE #11071
> > > > > CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
> > > > > NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
> > > > >
> > > > > www.cconlinelabs.com
> > > > > Your #1 choice for online Cisco rack rentals.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> Behalf
> > > > > Of Kenza@kenza.nl
> > > > > Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 3:08 AM
> > > > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > > Subject: anybody passed the CCIE r/s exam ?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Anybody got lab with only 3 switches to configure ? or is it the 4
> > > > > switches which have to be configured.
> > > > >
> > > > > im going to take the exam in januari.
> > > > >
> > > > > thx for your input
> > > > >
> > > > > rgds,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Disclaimer
> > > > >
> ********************************************************************
> > > > > **** Aan dit bericht kunnen geen rechten worden ontleend. Dit
> > > > > bericht is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Als u dit
> > > > > bericht per abuis hebt ontvangen, wordt u verzocht het te
> > > > > vernietigen en de afzender te informeren. Wij adviseren u om bij
> > > > > twijfel over de juistheid of de volledigheid van de mail contact
> met
> > > > > afzender op te nemen.
> > > > >
> > > > > This message shall not constitute any rights or obligations.
> > > > > This message is intended solely for the addressee.
> > > > > If you have received this message in error, please delete it and
> > > > > notify the sender immediately. When in doubt whether this message
> is
> > > > > correct or complete, please contact the sender.
> > > > >
> ********************************************************************
> > > > > ****
> > > > >
> > > > >
> ____________________________________________________________________
> > > > > ___ Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Disclaimer
> > >
> >***********************************************************************
> > > >* Aan dit bericht kunnen geen rechten worden ontleend. Dit bericht is
> > > >uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Als u dit bericht per
> abuis
> > > >hebt ontvangen, wordt u verzocht het te vernietigen en de afzender te
> > > >informeren. Wij adviseren u om bij twijfel over de juistheid of de
> > > >volledigheid van de mail contact met afzender op te nemen.
> > > >
> > > >This message shall not constitute any rights or obligations.
> > > >This message is intended solely for the addressee.
> > > >If you have received this message in error, please delete it and
> notify
> > > >the sender immediately. When in doubt whether this message is correct
> > > >or complete, please contact the sender.
> > >
> >***********************************************************************
> > > >*
> > > >
> > >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> > > >Subscription information may be found at:
> > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > >
> > >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> > > >Subscription information may be found at:
> > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > MSN Shopping has everything on your holiday list. Get expert picks by
> > > style,
> > > age, and price. Try it!
> > >
> > >
> >
>
http://shopping.msn.com/content/shp/?ctId=8000,ptnrid=176,ptnrdata=200601&tc
> > > ode=wlmtagline
> > >
> > >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> >Subscription information may be found at:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 02 2007 - 07:50:37 ART