Re: anybody passed the CCIE r/s exam ?

From: Gabriel Nunes (gabriel.nunes@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Dec 12 2006 - 09:41:07 ART


I agree yousel mohamed.

The score of BGP was strange...

On 12/12/06, yousef mohammed <ccie2752536@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I attend the exam on the first day of the change 13/11/2006. to be honest
> the 4 switches were not the problem. the problem realy was with the new
> features (IOS, QOS and Security). and i agree with every body that the BGP
> score was strange (0%), while the first question at least should be
> correct
> when you have been asked to do the initial connectivity.
>
> On 12/12/06, Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
> >
> > The format should be the same all around the world. India lab doesn't
> > have
> > local equipment anyway, it's remote-access to one of the other labs.
> >
> > Perhaps it's merely an indication that people fear change and freak out
> > about things? Or simply that some of the L2 stuff being focussed on is
> > not
> > what people taking the lab are prepared for?
> >
> >
> > Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
> JNCIE
> > #153, CISSP, et al.
> > CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
> > IPExpert VP - Curriculum Development
> > IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> > smorris@ipexpert.com
> > http://www.ipexpert.com
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Joe Yohannan [mailto:joe1265@hotmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 8:14 PM
> > To: swm@emanon.com; sales@kenza.nl; groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com;
> > ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: anybody passed the CCIE r/s exam ?
> >
> > 4 switches campared to 2 doesn't worry me.
> >
> > What does worry me is barely anyone has been passing since 11/13...
> >
> > I believe they have only gone through 50 numbers since then. That
> > includes
> > numbers for the other tracks and India still using old lab format.
> > (according to some one that posted here anyway) Prior to 11/13, they
> were
> > going through 100 numbers a month.
> >
> > - Joe Yo
> >
> >
> >
> > >From: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>
> > >Reply-To: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>
> > >To: "'Kenza@kenza.nl'" <sales@kenza.nl>, <groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com>,
> >
> > > <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > >Subject: RE: anybody passed the CCIE r/s exam ?
> > >Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:50:50 -0500
> > >
> > >And if you prepare your mind for the complexity, you may be pleasantly
> > >surprised if it's simple.
> > >
> > >And just because there are four switches doesn't mean the particular
> > >lab you have is that tough with it.
> > >
> > >As Tony said, same technology different layout.
> > >
> > >
> > >Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
> > >JNCIE #153, CISSP, et al.
> > >CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
> > >IPExpert VP - Curriculum Development
> > >IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> > >smorris@ipexpert.com
> > >http://www.ipexpert.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > >Kenza@kenza.nl
> > >Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 7:45 AM
> > >To: groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > >Subject: Re: anybody passed the CCIE r/s exam ?
> > >
> > >yes i know, but it get complex when you have 3 or 4 switches, more
> > >diffuclties then when you have just 2 switches.
> > >
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Tony Schaffran" <groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com>
> > >To: "'Kenza@kenza.nl'" <sales@kenza.nl>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > >Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 1:35 PM
> > >Subject: RE: anybody passed the CCIE r/s exam ?
> > >
> > >
> > > > No need to get hung up on the actual number of switches.
> > > >
> > > > Spanning-tree is the same regardless if there are 2 switches or 20.
> > > >
> > > > Focus on the technology and you will pass.
> > > >
> > > > Tony Schaffran
> > > > Network Analyst
> > > > CCIE #11071
> > > > CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
> > > > NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
> > > >
> > > > www.cconlinelabs.com
> > > > Your #1 choice for online Cisco rack rentals.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> > > > Of Kenza@kenza.nl
> > > > Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 3:08 AM
> > > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > Subject: anybody passed the CCIE r/s exam ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Anybody got lab with only 3 switches to configure ? or is it the 4
> > > > switches which have to be configured.
> > > >
> > > > im going to take the exam in januari.
> > > >
> > > > thx for your input
> > > >
> > > > rgds,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Disclaimer
> > > > ********************************************************************
> > > > **** Aan dit bericht kunnen geen rechten worden ontleend. Dit
> > > > bericht is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Als u dit
> > > > bericht per abuis hebt ontvangen, wordt u verzocht het te
> > > > vernietigen en de afzender te informeren. Wij adviseren u om bij
> > > > twijfel over de juistheid of de volledigheid van de mail contact met
> > > > afzender op te nemen.
> > > >
> > > > This message shall not constitute any rights or obligations.
> > > > This message is intended solely for the addressee.
> > > > If you have received this message in error, please delete it and
> > > > notify the sender immediately. When in doubt whether this message is
> > > > correct or complete, please contact the sender.
> > > > ********************************************************************
> > > > ****
> > > >
> > > > ____________________________________________________________________
> > > > ___ Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Disclaimer
> > >***********************************************************************
> > >* Aan dit bericht kunnen geen rechten worden ontleend. Dit bericht is
> > >uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Als u dit bericht per abuis
> > >hebt ontvangen, wordt u verzocht het te vernietigen en de afzender te
> > >informeren. Wij adviseren u om bij twijfel over de juistheid of de
> > >volledigheid van de mail contact met afzender op te nemen.
> > >
> > >This message shall not constitute any rights or obligations.
> > >This message is intended solely for the addressee.
> > >If you have received this message in error, please delete it and notify
> > >the sender immediately. When in doubt whether this message is correct
> > >or complete, please contact the sender.
> > >***********************************************************************
> > >*
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________________________________
> > >Subscription information may be found at:
> > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________________________________
> > >Subscription information may be found at:
> > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > MSN Shopping has everything on your holiday list. Get expert picks by
> > style,
> > age, and price. Try it!
> >
> >
> http://shopping.msn.com/content/shp/?ctId=8000,ptnrid=176,ptnrdata=200601&tc
> > ode=wlmtagline
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 02 2007 - 07:50:37 ART