From: Tony Schaffran (groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com)
Date: Mon Dec 11 2006 - 13:24:58 ART
It is just that this has nothing to do with the CCIE studies unless the
blueprint has changed recently and it was one hell of a sales pitch even
though it is a free product.
Tony Schaffran
Network Analyst
CCIE #11071
CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
www.cconlinelabs.com
Your #1 choice for online Cisco rack rentals.
-----Original Message-----
From: Darby Weaver [mailto:darbyweaver@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 8:17 AM
To: groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com; 'Brad Ellis'; 'Cisco certification'
Subject: RE: Rancid anyone?
Why would you say I seliing something?
Everyone of us here uses a rack of some sort.
If we can use freebie tools to compare our configs
against a known good configuration for easier grading
this is a good thing.
Would you not think so?
Effective study habits using effective tools.
Hmmm...
Why would you not want people to know this?
It is FREE!!!!
No selling.
You are work for cconlinelabs?
Does this conflict with what you are selling?
It helps those of us with our own racks.
Nothing more, nothing less
I'm not the vendor here.
--- Tony Schaffran <groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com>
wrote:
> "Go sell crazy somewhere else. We are all fulled up
> here."
>
> What is your commission for this SPAM?
>
> Tony Schaffran
> Network Analyst
> CCIE #11071
> CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
> NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
>
> www.cconlinelabs.com
> Your #1 choice for online Cisco rack rentals.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Darby Weaver
> Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2006 9:35 PM
> To: Darby Weaver; Brad Ellis; Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: Rancid anyone?
>
>
> If you are located in the US, regardless of your
> feelings, chances are that you need rancid or
> something like it for legal compliance -- between
> SOX,
> FISMA, and HIPAA, most commercial and government
> entities need lots of monitoring. If you don't
> think
> you need it now, but you are subject to any kind of
> auditing and haven't been audited yet, do yourself a
> favor and implement it now.
>
> Quite aside from legal issues, tools like rancid
> are
> great for lots of real-life reasons. They are good
> for:
>
> * detecting surprise changes ("when did that change
> occur? Sure would be nice to have an automated tool
> to tell us when someone makes a change in the middle
> of the night and forgets to send email");
>
> * security monitoring of routers ("where did that
> permissive ACL come from? Sure would be nice if a
> tool could tell us what changes occurred on routers,
> so if anything suspicious happens, we can know
> immediately instead of when it ends up in the
> media");
>
> * exercising router flashes ("Whoops, the flash
> went
> bad but the device continued to function in-memory,
> so
> nobody noticed until a power outage. Sure would be
> nice if we had a tool that periodically logged in to
> devices and ran a bunch of commands that demonstrate
> that it is working well");
>
> * backing up configs ("Our last manual backup of
> the
> router config was 5 years ago; we've upgraded it
> twice, and added lots of ACLs since then. Wouldn't
> an
> automated way to get config backups make sense?")
>
>
> --- Darby Weaver <darbyweaver@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Actually,
> >
> > I was thinking more of SolarWind's Cirrus product.
> >
> > And I was talking about Rancid and its usage of
> CVS
> > (Common Versioning System) to email configs of
> one's
> > network's devices to report change.
> >
> > I was thinking in terms of using these tools in
> > conjuntion with Cisco ACS for instance in the
> sense
> > of
> > Change Management and accountability.
> >
> >
> >
> > --- Brad Ellis <brad@ccbootcamp.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I fly a Cirrus SR-22...does that count???
> > >
> > > (actually, the darn thing almost ran me over
> > > yesterday...was pulling it out
> > > of the hanger down a steep downslope and the
> > > co-pilot side brakes
> > > failed...not a fun day)
> > >
> > > -b
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Darby Weaver" <darbyweaver@yahoo.com>
> > > To: "Cisco certification"
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2006 9:19 PM
> > > Subject: Rancid anyone?
> > >
> > >
> > > > Anyone using Rancid?
> > > >
> > > > Or are most using CatTools? CiscoWorks? or
> > Cirrus?
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 02 2007 - 07:50:37 ART