From: Tandou Mohamed (dtandou@yahoo.com)
Date: Sun Dec 10 2006 - 12:37:32 ART
Thanks Tony for your input
Tony Schaffran <groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com> wrote: That sounds like a simple filter list and they want you to summarize those
routes in the filter list instead of a single line for each route.
No need to make it any more difficult.
Tony Schaffran
Network Analyst
CCIE #11071
CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
www.cconlinelabs.com
Your #1 choice for online Cisco rack rentals.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Tandou Mohamed
Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2006 6:41 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: IPEXPERT LAB 36
GS,
need a clarifiaction on lab 36 if someone has done it
RIP Configuration
New routers will be joining the 136.10.12.0/24 subnet. R2 should not
accept/retain any RIP routes from these new routers. However, R1 should
accept the new routes.
The following five additional new routers will be added on 136.10.12/24
subnet:
- 136.10.12.101
- 136.10.12.102
- 136.10.12.103
- 136.10.12.165
- 136.10.12.166
Configure R2 with minimum number of commands
The subnet 136.10.12/24 is the network between R1 and R2.
How should i configure the above network? as secondary ip address or
loopback ?
Thanks,
Mohamed
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 02 2007 - 07:50:37 ART