From: Andrew Bruce Caslow (abcaslow@netmasterclass.net)
Date: Wed Dec 06 2006 - 10:45:32 ART
Hi Mohamed,
You are on the right track. This is normal behavior for redistributing from
one IGP into another in an IPv6 environment. In addition to performing a
"redistribute connected" operation along with performing the explicit IGP
redistribution operation, you can combine these two operations with the
"include-connected" option that is an available paramter with the IPv6
redistribution command. Here are some examples:
R1(config-rtr)#ipv router ospf 1
R1(config-rtr)#redistribute rip test include-connected
R1(config-rtr)#ipv6 router rip test
R1(config-rtr)#redistribute ospf 1 include-connected
Regarding it being different from performing redistribution in an IPv4
environment, the answer is yes and no. You did not see such behavior when
redistribuing RIP, EIGRP or OSPF. You did see such behavior when ISIS was
redistributed.
HTH,
-Bruce Caslow CCIE #3139
NetMasterClass, LLC
www.netmasterclass.net
A Cisco Learning Partner
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Mohamed Saeed
> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 3:23 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: IPv6 Redistribution - OSPFv3/RIPng
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> When I redistribute between OSPFv3 and RIPng, directly connect
> interfaces in each IGP are not automatically redistributed into the
> other IGP and I have to redistribute connected interface, this was not
> the behavior is IPv4. Is this normal or I am missing something here?
>
>
>
> Kind Regards
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 02 2007 - 07:50:36 ART