From: Mike O (mikeeo@email.msn.com)
Date: Tue Nov 28 2006 - 23:15:16 ART
I am totally confused. Why do I need to match interfaces?
Here are my configs:
router ospf 1
router-id 150.1.5.5
log-adjacency-changes
area 45 virtual-link 150.1.4.4
redistribute eigrp 10 subnets route-map BLOCK_LOOP
redistribute rip metric 1 subnets route-map RIP_5_10
network 150.1.5.5 0.0.0.0 area 0
network 176.1.45.5 0.0.0.0 area 45
network 176.1.145.5 0.0.0.0 area 0
neighbor 176.1.145.4
neighbor 176.1.145.1
distance 180 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 SW1_RIP
!
router rip
version 2
redistribute ospf 1 metric 1
passive-interface default
no passive-interface Ethernet0
network 0.0.0.0
route-map BLOCK_LOOP deny 10
match tag 1
!
route-map BLOCK_LOOP permit 20
!
route-map NO_LOOP permit 10
set tag 5
!
route-map RIP_5_10 permit 10
match metric 1 2 3 4 5
set tag 5
!
route-map RIP_5_10 permit 20
match metric 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
set tag 10
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Dennis" <bdennis@internetworkexpert.com>
To: "Mike O" <mikeeo@email.msn.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Cc: <cbalik@adelphia.net>
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 8:57 PM
Subject: RE: RIP and connected
When you redistribute RIP into OSPF the router automatically
redistributed the connected interfaces that RIP is running on into OSPF
for you. If you manually redistribute connected routes into OSPF, your
configuration needs to take into account what the router was doing for
you automatically when you redistributed RIP.
So yes you will need to add the RIP connected interfaces to the
route-map. Also this isn't a RIP/OSPF specific behavior.
HTH,
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike O [mailto:mikeeo@email.msn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 5:44 PM
To: Brian Dennis; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Cc: cbalik@adelphia.net
Subject: Re: RIP and connected
Actually I do, but its tagging routes, does that mean everytime I use a
route-map I have to match connected interfaces? or is this case specific
to
RIP only?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Dennis" <bdennis@internetworkexpert.com>
To: "Mike O" <mikeeo@email.msn.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 8:37 PM
Subject: RE: RIP and connected
Are you redistributing connected routes into OSPF and using a route-map?
If so permit in the route-map the connected interfaces that RIP is
running on.
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Mike O
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 5:30 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RIP and connected
Hey All, I have a situation in my lab where I put an interface into rip
which connects to the back bone , but when I redistribute RIP into OSPF
on
the same router the rip routes from the back bone come over, but not the
rip
connected route. Any ideas?
-Mike
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:49 ART