From: Xiangling (xianglingzj@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Nov 28 2006 - 04:08:13 ART
Thanks for the comments, but the largest difference between IEWB or IPExpert
and Assessor Lab(AL) is that AL provide marking based on Cisco standard. IE
or IPExpert, on the other hand, may not be so exact as the AL. It might be
95% or even 99% similar, but I would like to fine calibrate my standard with
Cisco one, as, god knows maybe Cisco will fail me because just the 2 or 3
points for the "slight difference".
Regards,
Xiangling
On 11/28/06, Rodrigo Paes <rpaes@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 10:35:27 +0800
> Xiangling <xianglingzj@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Buddies,
> >
> > I thinking about whether to take the assessor lab. Any of you have
> already
> > taken it and found it useful? How does it goes as compare to real
> exams?
> > (The difficulty level, complexity, style of question...
> anything). Thanks.
> >
>
> I can't comment on the content, because I never used it after it became
> "assessor lab" ... But I did use Lab Gear a couple of times, and I
> _really_ hated that java terminal.
>
> IMHO, you're better off getting a mock lab from IE or IPExperts...
>
>
> []s
> rodrigo
>
>
>
>
> --
> =========================================
> \ .-. +++ Rodrigo Paes +++ \
> / /v\ CCIE #14054 (R&S and SP) /
> \ // \\ LPIC2 #19753 \
> / /( )\ Linux User #324449 /
> \ ^^-^^ \
> / jabber: panfleto@jabber.org /
> \ gtalk : rodp43s@gmail.com \
> ==========================================
>
> "Mesure with a micrometer Mark with chalk. Cut with an axe"
>
-- Thanks & Regards, Xiangling |-------------------------| | | \ I Love You All / \ / \___________/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:48 ART