From: Udo (ccie_groupstudy@yahoo.de)
Date: Mon Nov 27 2006 - 09:46:10 ART
Hi Mohamed,
yes this was the problem ...
I was confused anbout the outputs...
thx
udo
> Hi Udo,
>
> It seems that you are doing BGP aggregation with the "summary-only"
> keyword. As per your output below, it seems that you are sending an
> aggregate of 174.1.0.0/16. That causes the more specific routes (that is
> 174.1.1.0 - 174.1.4.0 and so on) to be suppressed on the router
> generating the aggregate.
>
> Regards
> Mohamed ...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Udo
> Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2006 8:40 PM
> To: CCIE Groupstudy
> Subject: BGP - Suppressed Routes
>
> Hi all,
>
> right now I working in my lab with bgp ..
> When I have a look at the output 'show ip bgp' I saw routes with the
> following states
> ================snip==================================================
> ...
> s>i174.1.1.0/24 150.1.1.1 0 100 0 ?
> r>i174.1.3.0/24 174.1.13.3 0 100 0 (65038) i
> s>i174.1.4.0/24 150.1.4.4 0 100 0 i
> s>i174.1.7.0/24 150.1.6.6 0 100 0 (65038
> 65267) i
> ...........
> ============snap=====================================================
>
> can anyone explain me why are two routes in the 's' state ?
> This routes are redistribute from two peers.
>
> What does it exactly mean 'suppressed' and what is a possible reason for
> this behavior
>
> THX
> Udo
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Der fr|he Vogel fdngt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail:
> http://mail.yahoo.de
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:48 ART