Re: No keepalive

From: Petr Lapukhov (petr@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Mon Nov 27 2006 - 03:52:07 ART

• Next message: Alexey Tolstenok: "Re: No keepalive"
• Previous message: Alexey Tolstenok: "No keepalive"
• Maybe in reply to: Alexey Tolstenok: "No keepalive"
• Next in thread: Alexey Tolstenok: "Re: No keepalive"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi, Alexey,

Basically, this disables LMI and permits "static" PVCs configuration.
You are right, this trick is most often used in back-to-back FR DTE-to-DTE
connection scenarios (no FR DCE and FR switch involved)

2006/11/27, Alexey Tolstenok <alextols@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi GS
> What's the point of having 'no keepalives' on p2p direct FR links?
> (without
> FR switch)
>
> --
> SY, Alexey
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>

-- 
Petr Lapukhov, CCIE #16379
petr@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Outside US: 775-826-4344

• Next message: Alexey Tolstenok: "Re: No keepalive"
• Previous message: Alexey Tolstenok: "No keepalive"
• Maybe in reply to: Alexey Tolstenok: "No keepalive"
• Next in thread: Alexey Tolstenok: "Re: No keepalive"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:48 ART