Re: ospf virtual-link

From: Liu_Liao (liu_liao@yahoo.com.tw)
Date: Wed Nov 22 2006 - 06:01:57 ART


Hi All
Thsanks!
My the frame-relay switch is fully mesh.
I disable no need the pvc then our error message is OK
I saw all pvc on the RTB.
example
RTB to RTC dlci is RTB204 <----> 402(RTC)
I saw pvc 201,202,203...... on my RTB and I delete the 201 on
frame-relay switch then the ospf is OK.

Scott Morris fe0:

> And the switch isn't participating and splitting things somehow?
>
> What's "sh ip o n" show? And where's area 52? i thought it was area
> 10. And your 10.1.2.0 is area 0 according to your configs, but area
> 10 according to diagram.
>
> Apparantly many things aren't matching.
>
>
> Scott Morris, *CCIE_4_ (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
> JNCIE #153*/, CISSP, et al./
> /CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J/
> IPExpert VP - Curriculum Development
> IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> smorris@ipexpert.com
> http://www.ipexpert.com
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Liu_Liao [mailto:liu_liao@yahoo.com.tw]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 21, 2006 12:56 AM
> *To:* swm@emanon.com
> *Cc:* 'ccielab groupstudy'
> *Subject:* Re: ospf virtual-link
>
> Hi All
> ===RTA===
> interface Ethernet0/0
> ip address 10.1.2.1 255.255.255.0
> ip ospf priority 200
> half-duplex
> !
> router ospf 1
> router-id 10.10.1.1
> log-adjacency-changes
> network 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> network 10.1.2.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> !
>
>
> ===RTB===
> interface FastEthernet1/0
> ip address 10.1.2.3 255.255.255.0
> ip ospf priority 0
> duplex auto
> speed auto
> !
> router ospf 5
> router-id 10.10.5.5
> log-adjacency-changes
> network 10.10.5.5 0.0.0.0 area 0
> network 10.1.2.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> network 10.1.3.1 0.0.0.0 area 52
>
> Tks!
>
> Scott Morris fe0:
>
>> So what's RTB's config then?
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* Liu_Liao [mailto:liu_liao@yahoo.com.tw]
>> *Sent:* Monday, November 20, 2006 9:46 AM
>> *To:* swm@emanon.com
>> *Cc:* 'ccielab groupstudy'
>> *Subject:* Re: ospf virtual-link
>>
>>
>>
>> RTC RTA
>> SW1 RTB RTD
>>
>> All OSPF interfaces type is broadcast
>>
>>
>> Scott Morris fe0:
>>
>>>Well, it appears that you don't have an ABR in your picture. Some router
>>>needs to be in both area 0 and area 10. Or, create the virtual link
>>>somewhere! OSPF is interface-centric in its area configuration. Your
>>>diagram would be appropriate for ISIS which is router-centric for its
>>>config.
>>>
>>>HTH,
>>>
>>>
>>>Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
>>>#153, CISSP, et al.
>>>CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
>>>IPExpert VP - Curriculum Development
>>>IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
>>>smorris@ipexpert.com
>>>http://www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>>PS. Stick area 10 on RTC-RTA link. Or stick area 10 on RTA-(next ospf
>>>neighbor) link. Or stick area 0 on RTB-(next ospf neighbor) link.
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>>>Liu_Liao
>>>Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 3:04 AM
>>>To: 'ccielab groupstudy'
>>>Subject: ospf virtual-link
>>>
>>>Hi All
>>>
>>>(OSPF Area0 10.1.3.0/24) (OSPF Area 0 10.1.1.x/24) RTC <--> RTA <--> SW1
>>><--> RTB (OSPF Area 10 10.1.2.0/24) May I need enable the virtual-link for
>>>RTB My the RTB show "Received invalid packet: mismatch area ID, from
>>>backbone area must be virtual-link but not found from RTA's IP"
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________________________________
>>>Subscription information may be found at:
>>>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:48 ART