From: Michael Zuo (mzuo@ixiacom.com)
Date: Tue Nov 21 2006 - 18:28:27 ART
If you remove the portfast, it will just take longer for the port to
come up ...
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Capt.Spock
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 1:30 PM
To: Group Study
Subject: spanning-tree portfast
> On our production network I saw use of "spanning-tree portfast" on
several
> scenarios connected to switches... I know it makes sense to put this
command
> connected to servers and put spanning-tree portfast bpduguard
defaultglobal configuration. But if I do that now I am sure this will
screw up....
> Is it safe to remove spanning-tree portfast on any ports connected to
> switches?
>
> interface GigabitEthernet3/12
> description temp connection for CSS server management ports
> switchport access vlan 123
> switchport mode access
> spanning-tree portfast
>
>
> interface GigabitEthernet0/13
>
> description to another switch
>
> switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
>
> switchport trunk native vlan 254
>
> switchport trunk allowed vlan 254
>
> switchport mode trunk
>
> *spanning-tree portfast*
>
> **
>
> interface GigabitEthernet0/13
>
> description to another switch
>
> *spanning-tree portfast *
>
> **
>
> **
>
> interface GigabitEthernet0/13
>
> description to another switch
>
> *spanning-tree portfast *
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:48 ART