From: Michael Zuo (mzuo@ixiacom.com)
Date: Tue Nov 21 2006 - 02:33:25 ART
Hi Salman, also, depends on the topology and requirements, you might
want to consider setting the cir/bc/mincir in map-class instead to the
interface...
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Bob Sinclair
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 6:58 AM
To: 'Salman Abbas'; 'ccie >> Cisco certification'
Subject: RE: FR Traffic Shaping Question
Troy,
I only see two rates mentioned, 128K and 48K. So I would interpret 128K
as
the CIR, with no excess burst. I would put the mincir at 48K (since
that is
the value you do not want to throttle below) and the Bc at 16K.
You have probably seen this one, but here is a good link on the topic:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/125/traffic_shaping_6151.html
HTH,
Bob Sinclair
CCIE 10427 CCSI 30427
www.netmasterclass.net
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Salman Abbas
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 4:32 AM
To: ccie >> Cisco certification
Subject: FR Traffic Shaping Question
Hi Guys,
Pls help in answering the following question:
Configure your router's interface s0 running FR for *RATE
LIMITING*according to the following information:
maximum throughput (AR) is 128kbps
TC is 125 ms
Provider will *mark any traffic in excess* of 48kbps *as* *discard
eligible*
Hence, *make sure throughput changes accordingly*, but based on *BECNs
received ONLY*.
Now taking the information mentioned above into consideration, what
would be
my:
CIR
Bc
Be
mincir
I came up with the following answer but please correct me if I'm wrong
map-class frame-relay FRTS
frame-relay cir 48000
frame-relay bc 6000
frame-relay be 10000
frame-relay mincir 24000
frame-relay adaptive-shaping becn
int s0
frame-relay traffic-shaping
frame-relay class FRTS
Thanks in advance,
Cheers!!!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:48 ART