From: Elliott Reyes (elliottreyes@adelphia.net)
Date: Thu Nov 16 2006 - 01:35:33 ART
It's on the website now, But I think there's still some cleanup left to do
They show 12.4 code on 2620 routers for R1 and R2.
Not sure if you could do that unless they have a trick way of doing it
If so please let me know.
Elliott
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Ken
Diliberto
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 7:44 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: VTP issue with IEWB-RS version 4 sample lab
Can you post the entire lab so we can all have a look at it?
Michael Zuo wrote:
> Hi Group,
>
>
>
> I ran into an issue with the new sample lab with 4 switches and am
> wondering if someone else has seen it or I've made a mistake somewhere:
>
>
>
> For the switching part, when all the trunk ports are set up, the links
> between SW3 and SW4 (port 19, 20) will go into blocking because spanning
> tree and trunk exists between SW1/SW2, SW1/SW4 and SW2/SW3. this means
> VTP will not work between SW3 and SW4 even though it is part of the
> requirement of section 1.1
>
>
>
> The catch is that even by adjusting port-priority and port-cost to make
> the trunks between SW3 and SW4 come up, it will bring down trunk links
> between another pair of switches. Because of the way the requirements
> are set up (only vlan 102 can traverse between SW1 and SW4), no other
> trunk links can be brought down without losing connectivity for at least
> one vlan.
>
>
>
> The only solution I can see is PVST which is not part of the solution.
>
>
>
> Am I missing something very simple or maybe there is another workaround?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:47 ART