RE: Has anyone used netmasterclass's Frame Relay Class on

From: Plank, Jason (JPlank@concordefs.com)
Date: Wed Nov 15 2006 - 21:01:20 ART


LIKE, OMG NMC ROX0RZ

-------------------
Jason Plank, CCIE #16560
Technical Support Architect
101 Bellevue Parkway
Wilmington, DE 19809
E-mail: JPlank@concordefs.com
Phone: 302-793-5913

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Darby Weaver
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 6:49 PM
To: Adam S. Roth; anthony.sequeira@thomson.com; ivan@iip.net;
ccielab@groupstudy.com; dukelondon@gmail.com
Subject: RE: Has anyone used netmasterclass's Frame Relay Class on Demand
yet?

Hey,

I'm pretty good with Frame.

I've seen the competition and some are quite nice.

But I still think NMC sets the bar for quality, price,
and value.

Did I mention for sheer comprehensive coverage?

How can you not like buying one product and being
finished?

I've bought nearly everything there is and I asked
Bruce this earlier this year - why not start a ground
level program.

Well - it looks like he heard me and found Anthony S.
to be a poster child.

BTW - Anyone with access - look for what the guys at
NMC did for switching. I love their explanation of
the Native VLAN and a few tricks not seen elsewhere.

Kewlicious!

I bought it - So I'll review it later and let you know
what I think.

BTW - I do not work for NMC. Not affiliated except as
a customer and I've bought most if not all of the
competition's work as well and am on their client
rosters as well.

--- "Adam S. Roth" <adam@therothfamily.net> wrote:

> LOL if loving their product is BIAS, then count me
> in completely. I
> will say I am bias. I have done a little so far on
> the COD and love it.
> Then again I guess I love anyone who returns my
> emails when I ask stupid
> questions!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> anthony.sequeira@thomson.com
> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 3:37 PM
> To: darbyweaver@yahoo.com; ivan@iip.net;
> ccielab@groupstudy.com;
> dukelondon@gmail.com
> Subject: RE: Has anyone used netmasterclass's Frame
> Relay Class on
> Demand yet?
>
>
> Yes - I was honored that NetMasterClass asked for my
> assistance with the
> CoD project!
>
> While it was a true honor to be asked - I had to
> take a good hard look
> at their approach to this and ensure it was
> something that I would be
> interested in. You see, I have been teaching
> full-time online since 1999
> and I am very passionate and particular about this
> training methodology.
>
> In my opinion - if e-learning is done correctly - it
> is by far the most
> powerful method of training available, especially
> for such topics as
> CCIE. BUT - if done incorrectly - it is probably the
> LEAST effective
> method!
>
> I was extremely impressed with the NMC approach and
> was excited to say
> YES. While I could go on an on about the various
> features...no one would
> really listen (rightly so) since there is definite
> bias in my review. I
> will just say this - I have yet to see a more
> comprehensive approach to
> online IE prep. In fact - it sells the product a bit
> short since many of
> the companies that purchase this product will NOT be
> doing so for CCIE
> prep.
>
> I will speak to NMC about a complimentary test
> subscription for Group
> Study addicts so you can all try it for
> yourselves....
>
> Anthony J. Sequeira
> #15626
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Darby Weaver
> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 6:35 AM
> To: Ivan; ccielab@groupstudy.com; Salman Abbas
> Subject: Has anyone used netmasterclass's Frame
> Relay Class on Demand
> yet?
>
> Looks like Anthony Sequiera is involved with the
> project from our own Groupstudy.
>
> Any comments?
>
> >From what I can tell it is Class on Demand and NMC
> Subject Matter Labs all rolled into one subject.
> Plus quizzes. Looks very comprehensive.
>
> I guess they are doing one for each subject area.
> Kinda like CBT Nuggets but this one one Frame Relay
> is
> 10 sections and about 5 hours alone + a series of
> labs
> (4hours each???).
>
> Seems like it is kinda like CCBootcamp's Soup to
> Nuts
> Workboook but with video and like Internetwork
> Expert's COD but with comprehensive exercises.
>
> Price is $149.00 list. Is it worth it?
>
>
> Any feedback would be appreciated.
>
> http://www.netmasterclass.com/site/cod_fr.php
>
>
>
> Frame-Relay Class-on-Demand outline
> -----------------------------------
> Block 1 VOD 1: Frame-Relay Theory and Operations
> VOD
> --------------
> Frame Relay support for multiple protocols including
> TCP, IP, IPX and DECNET.
> History (per FRF).
> Theory of Operations (UNI, NNI, DLCI).
> Frame Structure.
> Interface Types.
> Advantages over TDM.
> Access speeds: dial through T3.
> Frame over DSL (over ATM core) see newedge networks.
> Frame-ATM internetworking.
> Trend.
> Block 1 VOD 2: DTE to DTE Communications
> --------------
> DTE Interfaces
> Encapsulation per interface/per DLCI
> physical/logical
> multipoint/point-to-point
> Interface Status
> Show interface
> Show frame PVC
> Backup interface
> Encapsulation Types  Which method of specifying the
> upper layer protocol will be used?
> Cisco (default)
> IETF
> Type set on physical interface, or on end of
> interface-DLCI, or on end of map statement.
> Must match end-to-end in that non-Cisco routers
> (Juniper) use only IETF.
> Cisco routers will work even with mismatch, since
> the
> router does understand both.
> Enabling CDP
> Disabled by default on frame relay interfaces
> Can be enabled per interface or sub-interface cdp
> enable
> Frame network will be transparent to cdp
> Enabling on physical does NOT enable it for
> sub-interfaces
> Block 1 VOD 3: Local Management Interface
> --------------
> Overview: purpose and operation
> Status information between Frame-Relay devices (UNI,
> NNI)
> Message types
> Status Enquiry sent by DTE
> Status Message Frame sent by DCE
> Update Status Message
> Types: ANSI, ITU, Cisco
> cisco
> ansi (aka Annex-D)
> q933a (aka Annex-A)
> Differences
> Configuration, Autosense
> ELMI
> Show and Debugs
> Number of PVCs limited by MTU.
> Block 1 VOD 4: Frame-Relay Mapping
> --------------
> Purpose, multipoint versus point-to-point
> Dynamic (Inverse ARP)
> Basic Operation
> Options: frame inarp interval / ip
> Limitations
> Disabling
> Clear frame inarp
> Static
> Local Address
> Broadcast keyword
> Map bridge / clns / IPv6
> Show frame map
> Block 1 VOD 5: Full Mesh vs. Hub and Spoke
> --------------
> Topology
> TTL, Broadcast domain segmentation
> Mixing static and dynamic maps
> MTU Issues
> Controller MTU vs IP MTU
> Demo: ping with high MTU, 4000 byte packet from
> spoke
> to spoke with default mtu at hub. How get packet
> thru.
> Ping with df-bit set, demo M response. See debug
> ip
> icmp on hub.
> Quad Zero Maps
> Block 1 VOD 6: Frame-Relay Switching in IOS
> --------------
> Real life switching equipment
> Lab:
> 2522, virtual switch with tunnel
> Set clock rate for back-to-back cables
>
=== message truncated ===



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:47 ART