From: srdja blagojevic (srdja1@pexim.co.yu)
Date: Wed Nov 15 2006 - 09:27:50 ART
I thought that I read in some document that if you use rtp priority with
llq, rtp priority override llq settings.
AFAIK for hybrid FRTS MQC, available bandwidth for priority command is
calculated from mincir value.
hth,
Srdja
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
david robin
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 22:56
To: Cisco certification
Subject: frame relay rtp priority and priority command ( IWEB LAB 13 task
8.5)
I Have a question,
suppose we have the following configuration
interface Serial1/0.501 point-to-point
ip address 139.1.15.5 255.255.255.0
ip rip advertise 3
frame-relay interface-dlci 501
class dlci-501
frame-relay ip rtp header-compression
!
map-class frame-relay dlci-502
frame-relay cir 512000
frame-relay bc 5120
frame-relay mincir 512000
service-policy output http-11
frame-relay fragment 480
frame-relay ip rtp priority 16384 16383 512 !
policy-map http-11
class http-11
priority percent 80
!
with this configuration router 1 prioritze data traffic at 80 % of cir, and
voice traffic have strict priority to 512 k ( with ip rtp prio)
what confuse me is when I read about frame-relay ip rtp priority command
from DOC cd I found the following
"The sum of all bandwidth allocation for voice and data flows on an
interface cannot exceed 75 percent of the total available bandwidth, unless
you change the default maximum reservable bandwidth. To change the maximum
reservable bandwidth, use the *max-reserved-bandwidth* command on the
interface"
link is
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios124/124tcr/tqos_
r/qos_a1ht.htm#wp1148783
and the above configuration has more than the CIR bandwidth. so is there is
any something wrong ??
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:47 ART