From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Sat Nov 11 2006 - 21:27:42 ART
If you want separate allocations of 20% you need to have separate listings
in your policy map.
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
IPExpert VP - Curriculum Development
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
smorris@ipexpert.com
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
walberto ralon
Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 6:07 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Class Based Control
People,
I was going over some practice exams that were asking me to guarantee
20% of bandwidth for protocol A, and 20% for protocol B. My question is, in
order to guarantee each protocol its specified bandwidth percentage, do I
need separate class entries in my policy-map? How would the router treat an
entry like below:
policy-map whatever
class both_protocols
bandwidth percent 20
class-map both_protocols
match access-group name ImLazy
ip access-list extended ImLazy
permit protocol A
permit protocol B (nevermind the ACL syntax... that isn't my question.
I SWEAR I know how to write an ACL :-))
So..... will each protocol get it's own 20%?? Or because there is only one
class statement, there will only be one serving of 20% to share?
Thank you.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:46 ART