From: Darby Weaver (darbyweaver@yahoo.com)
Date: Sat Nov 11 2006 - 03:52:33 ART
Hmmm...
Back in class - at NMC2 this came up and I was told to
do the minimum required necessary to accomplish a
given task.
And peering with eBGP peers via the loopbacks means
adding additional commands like ebgp-multihop.
Now one of the guys who was in class with me
consistently scored 95+ percent on Caslow's CheckIT
Labs and he passed the lab the first time and made it
look easy.
So...
You may want tread carefully using extra
configuration.
I configured extra on some things and my score report
reflected things that make now think to read the
question and answer exactly what is asked.
Your money.
--- John Jones <acer0001@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is how I have been doing it as well. Having
> eBGP peers go to loopbacks
> is a pain in the butt. I have had to run an IGP or
> use static routes between
> ASs, which doesn't make much sense, but it works
> (for a lab envornment
> anyways).
>
> John
>
>
>
>
> On 11/9/06, Mohamed Saeed
> <mohamed_saeed2@rayacorp.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> >
> >
> > I am asking about the best practice during the lab
> regarding the iBGP
> > and eBGP peering.
> >
> >
> >
> > What I am doing is that for eBGP I do the peering
> using the physical IP
> > address of the eBGP neighbor (unless otherwise
> stated). For iBGP, I
> > usually do the peering on the loopback addresses
> of the iBGP peers even
> > if the two iBGP peers are interconnected using a
> single physical link
> > and even if the task does not ask for that. I am
> asking if I doing not
> > so good thing here.
> >
> >
> >
> > Kind Regards
> >
> > Mohamed Saeed, CCNP - CCIP
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:46 ART