From: Darby Weaver (darbyweaver@yahoo.com)
Date: Sat Nov 11 2006 - 03:37:39 ART
Correct,
So it really means read the question and look
carefully to see if the wording is exactly referring
to a particular interface...
or if perhaps you may be asked to later include other
interfaces, like a loopback and maybe you are
restricted from adding more network statements or
using redistributed connected etc.
Easy to fall into this one...
--- "Schulz, Dave" <DSchulz@dpsciences.com> wrote:
> This could always be a catchy part, like where you
> may be asked to add a
> loopback later in the lab....and it happens to falls
> in the range
> covered by the mask.
>
>
> Dave Schulz,
> Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Lab Rat #109385382
> Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 7:36 PM
> To: 'Michael Zuo'; Mengdi Cao; Mike O
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: confused about network statements
>
> Wow, is this true? I have always thought it best
> practice to advertise
> the
> exact subnet the interface is a part of...??
>
> Can someone please explain the best practice here
> (in Cisco Lab terms,
> of
> course)?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Michael Zuo
> Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 3:59 PM
> To: Mengdi Cao; Mike O
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: confused about network statements
>
> Plus you don't have to remember/figure out what the
> mask should be...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Mengdi Cao
> Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 8:18 AM
> To: Mike O
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: confused about network statements
>
> Hi, Mike,
>
> I believe the most simple answer is always use
> 0.0.0.0 unless otherwise
> specified. This is to avoid unnecessary interfaces
> to be involved in
> the
> routing protocol.
>
> Regards,
> Xiangling
>
>
> On 11/10/06, Mike O <mikeeo@email.msn.com> wrote:
> >
> > I took the Assessor lab recently and had questions
> marked wrong
> because I
> > used a 0.0.0.255 mask statement instead of 0.0.0.0
> , I understand when
>
> > they ask you to only enable the routing protocol
> on a specific
> > interface
> you
> > can
> > use a mask of 0.0.0.0 in combination with
> passive-interface, but these
>
> > questions didn't specify. Should it be when in
> doubt use a mask of
> 0.0.0.0
> > ?
> >
> > -Mike
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:46 ART