From: Michael Stout (michaelgstout@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Nov 09 2006 - 03:20:43 ART
i worked this problem and i encountered problems too.
The debug message is saying you have a backup interface.
I wish i could rememeber the problem, but I think i was doing my
troubleshooting on the other side of the networ, on R3, 1 and 2.
I think I was getting asymetric traffic for egress and ingress flows, but
again, it was a long time ago.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Danilo Rodrigues" <dani.rodrigues@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "Danilo Rodrigues" <dani.rodrigues@gmail.com>
To: "Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Subject: Is the question correct ? (Core Workbook - lab4 - task5.2)
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 14:30:13 -0200
Hi all,
It is about the task 5.2
--------R1-------
| | |
| | |
| | |
R5 ---| | R3
| | |
| | |
| | |
--------R2-------
R1 - R2 - R3 - running OSPF
R1 - R2 - R3 - running EIGRP
R1 - R2 - mutual redistribution (same metric in both routers)
Loopback's from R1 and R2 in OSPF
Then, R5 has two EIGRP entries for 150.1.1.1
Rack1R5#sh ip route 150.1.1.1
Routing entry for 150.1.1.0/24
Known via "eigrp 10", distance 170, metric 281856, type external
Redistributing via eigrp 10, rip
Advertised by rip metric 5
Last update from 152.1.125.2 on Ethernet0/0, 00:13:50 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 152.1.125.2, from 152.1.125.2, 00:13:50 ago, via Ethernet0/0
Route metric is 281856, traffic share count is 1
Total delay is 1010 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 10000 Kbit
Reliability 255/255, minimum MTU 1500 bytes
Loading 1/255, Hops 1
152.1.125.1, from 152.1.125.1, 00:13:50 ago, via Ethernet0/0
Route metric is 281856, traffic share count is 1
Total delay is 1010 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 10000 Kbit
Reliability 255/255, minimum MTU 1500 bytes
Loading 1/255, Hops 1
R5 is in BGP 100
R1 and R2 in BGP 200
The question ask to R5 routes through R1 using MED.
So, BGP table in R5 shows:
*> 222.22.2.0 150.1.1.1 200 0 200 254
?
* 150.1.2.2 250 0
200 254
?
That is correct and I could stop here.
But R5 know 150.1.1.1 via R1 and R2 !!!!
So, when trace from R4 (inside AS100) sometimes this:
Rack1R4#traceroute 222.22.2.0
Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to 222.22.2.0
1 152.1.45.5 44 msec 40 msec 40 msec
2 152.1.125.1 40 msec 40 msec 32 msec <<<<<
3 152.1.123.3 72 msec 80 msec 80 msec
4 152.1.37.7 80 msec 80 msec 80 msec
5 *
and this:
Rack1R4#traceroute 222.22.2.0
Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to 222.22.2.0
1 152.1.45.5 44 msec 40 msec 40 msec
2 152.1.125.2 40 msec 40 msec 40 msec <<<<<<
3 152.1.123.3 80 msec 80 msec 92 msec
4 152.1.37.7 68 msec 80 msec 80 msec
5 *
So, my question is: Will I receive these points ? Is there any
problem with
the IGP configuration ?
In R5 I have the following message on "debug ip routing":
*Nov 6 22:42:24.699: is_up: 0 state: 4 sub state: 1 line: 0
has_route:
False
What it means ?
Thanks for any help.
Regards,
Danilo
_______________________________________________________________________
Subscription information may be found at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get FREE company branded e-mail accounts and business Web site from
Microsoft Office Live
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:45 ART