From: Frank (ocsic@web.de)
Date: Wed Nov 08 2006 - 04:58:26 ART
Brian McGahan schrieb:
Thanks Brian.
That's clear now.
> Static routes in IPv6 should not point to multipoint interfaces
> unless you have static layer 3 to layer 2 resolution for the final
> destination. This means when you configure a default IPv6 route via the
> "ipv6 route ::/0" command you should point it to a next-hop instead of
> an interface, unless the interface is point-to-point. It's based on the
> logic of how route recursion and layer 2 resolution occurs on multipoint
> interfaces.
>
>
> HTH,
>
> Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593 (R&S/SP)
> bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
> Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
> 24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
> Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
>>
> Of
>
>> Frank
>> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 9:01 PM
>> To: Cisco certification
>> Subject: ipv6 default route
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> i came accross a topic, i would like to clear.
>>
>> Why can a static ipv6 default route not be used as in ipv4? I read
>>
> about
>
>> "proxy icmp nd" and proxy arp requests being sent as multicasts.
>>
> What's
>
>> the difference to default routes from dynamic routing protocols?
>>
>>
>>
>> Frank
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:45 ART