From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Mon Nov 06 2006 - 18:31:52 ART
DLSw cannot be used to bridge IP.
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593 (R&S/SP)
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> Venkataramanaiah.R
> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 2:43 PM
> To: walberto ralon; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Bridging over IP
>
> I meant isnt DLSW meant only to switch LLC2 ?
>
> On 11/6/06, Venkataramanaiah. R <vramanaiah@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Is DLSW meant only to switch LLC2 ? Can it transport IP as well..?
> >
> > May be i am wrong but, i do not think so...!
> >
> > On 11/6/06, walberto ralon <wralon@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > it's been a while... but try this out.
> > >
> > > dlsw local-peer peer-id local-peer-ip
> > >
> > > dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp remote-peer-ip
> > >
> > >
> > > dlsw bridge-group 1
> > >
> > >
> > > interface Ethernet0
> > >
> > > bridge-group 1
> > > So a router with the same config (only flipped peer IP's) would be
on
> the
> > > other end of this cloud. So your subnet would tap into this
Ethernet0
> > > interface, and DLSw+ would encapsulate them within accross the
cloud.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/6/06, Venkataramanaiah. R <vramanaiah@gmail.com > wrote:
> > > > It is like this..
> > > >
> > > > Host A - 1.1.1.1/24 ----- IP Cloud ---- Host B 1.1.1.2/24
> > > >
> > > > These hosts dont have capabilities to configure default gateway
and
> > > > both hosts can not have IP on different subnets. They have to be
on
> > > > same subnet.
> > > >
> > > > This user network 1.1.1.0/24 will not be routed in the IP cloud.
> > > > Packets from Host A to B and vice versa must be encapsulated
over IP
> > > > and transported over the IP cloud..
> > > >
> > > > Is this achievable in the first place.. If yes, then how..?
> > > >
> > > > On 11/6/06, walberto ralon <wralon@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Venkat,
> > > > > Are you looking to preserve separate broadcast domains?
If
> not,
> > > use
> > > > > transparent bridging, but keep in mind that you are in essence
> sharing
> > > the
> > > > > same bridge for both subnets.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 11/6/06, Venkataramanaiah.R < vramanaiah@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would like to bridge two ethernet segments over an IP
cloud...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is this possible? If yes, what options do i have..
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > -Venkat
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:45 ART