From: WorkerBee (ciscobee@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Nov 03 2006 - 12:41:14 ART
ASA does an ugly way of doing RRI "Reverse Route Injection" of host routes
unlike VPN 3k, it can inject subnet.
ASA cannot perform QoS over tunnel interfaces.
VPN3k GUI is much nicer and richer in support.
On 11/3/06, cstubbs@tampabay.rr.com <cstubbs@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> Guys,
> For an enterprise network what are the pros and cons or desired hardware solution for a VPN termination appliance, ASA 5550 VS. VPN 3080 Concentrator? To me the performance level looks even, but the software features on the ASA seem limited vs. the VPN concentrator. Any thoughts?
>
>
>
> Chris
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:45 ART