RE: QoS Questions

From: Michael Zuo (mzuo@ixiacom.com)
Date: Mon Oct 30 2006 - 22:18:17 ART


Hi Ivan,

For third one (multicast rate-limiting), MQC with bandwidth would work
just as well?

thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Ivan
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 10:58 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com; Joe Carr
Subject: Re: QoS Questions

comment inline

On Monday 30 October 2006 20:32, Joe Carr wrote:
> Generator Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium) I have been studying for
my
> CCIE lab for some time now and I came across a couple QoS scenario
> questions that I had some trouble with. Let me know what you guys
think:
>
>
> Enable fragmentation on a point to point frame link so that the
maximum
> fragmented size of each packet will be 60 and voice packets do not get
> fragmented.
>

This question discussed earlier many more times.
*) priority queue (LLQ) doesn't fragment any packet while sending.
*) try to make voice packet less than 60 byte (ip header compress, rtp
header
compress)

>
>
> configure random detect on an interface for outgoing traffic so that
the
> following policies are met. Default traffic should be flow based.
> Bandwidth http: 1000
> Bandwidth tftp: 500
>

class-map match-all tftp
 match protocol tftp
class-map match-all http
 match protocol http
!
!
policy-map child
 class http
  bandwidth 1000
 class tftp
  bandwidth 500
policy-map main
 class class-default
  fair-queue
  random-detect
  service-policy child

R2#sh policy-map
  Policy Map main
    Class class-default
      Flow based Fair Queueing
      Bandwidth 0 (kbps)
            exponential weight 9
            class min-threshold max-threshold mark-probablity
            ----------------------------------------------------------

            0 - - 1/10
            1 - - 1/10
            2 - - 1/10
            3 - - 1/10
            4 - - 1/10
            5 - - 1/10
            6 - - 1/10
            7 - - 1/10
            rsvp - - 1/10

      service-policy child

  Policy Map ex

  Policy Map child
    Class http
      Bandwidth 1000 (kbps) Max Threshold 64 (packets)
    Class tftp
      Bandwidth 500 (kbps) Max Threshold 64 (packets)

>
> Rate limit multicast traffic on interface Fe0/0 inbound to that
multicast
> group 239.5.5.5 gets 100k of bandwidth and all other multicast gets
600k.
>

R2#sh run int s1/0
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 241 bytes
!
interface Serial1/0
 ip address 10.23.20.1 255.255.255.0
 ip pim sparse-dense-mode
 ip multicast rate-limit out group-list 1 100
 ip multicast rate-limit out 600
 encapsulation ppp
 ip igmp join-group 239.5.5.5
 serial restart-delay 0
end

R2#sh ip mroute int s1/0
IP Multicast Routing Table
Flags: D - Dense, S - Sparse, B - Bidir Group, s - SSM Group, C -
Connected,
       L - Local, P - Pruned, R - RP-bit set, F - Register flag,
       T - SPT-bit set, J - Join SPT, M - MSDP created entry,
       X - Proxy Join Timer Running, A - Candidate for MSDP
Advertisement,
       U - URD, I - Received Source Specific Host Report,
       Z - Multicast Tunnel, z - MDT-data group sender,
       Y - Joined MDT-data group, y - Sending to MDT-data group
Outgoing interface flags: H - Hardware switched, A - Assert winner
 Timers: Uptime/Expires
 Interface state: Interface, Next-Hop or VCD, State/Mode

(*, 239.5.5.5), 00:05:09/00:02:29, RP 0.0.0.0, flags: DCL
  Incoming interface: Null, RPF nbr 0.0.0.0
  Outgoing interface list:
    Serial1/0, Forward/Sparse-Dense, 00:05:09/00:00:00, limit 100 kbps
<-----

(*, 224.0.1.40), 00:05:10/00:02:28, RP 0.0.0.0, flags: DCL
  Incoming interface: Null, RPF nbr 0.0.0.0
  Outgoing interface list:
    Serial1/0, Forward/Sparse-Dense, 00:05:10/00:00:00, Int limit 600
kbps <--

>
>
>
>
> Joe
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:07 ART