From: WorkerBee (ciscobee@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Oct 29 2006 - 01:04:11 ART
You cannot use passive interface on EIGRP neighbors. EIGRP unlike RIP,
requires hello packets to form adjacency. RIP does not have neighbor r/s
concept.
Yes, use neighbor statements on "ALL" EIGRP peers to ensure only those
neighbors able to send/receive updates from each other.
router eigrp xx
neighbor x.x.x.x f0/0
neighbor y.y.y.y f0/0
You can verify using debug to send those updates.
On 10/29/06, Emil Patel <emilpatel@hotmail.com> wrote:
> If the question asked to only send eigrp updates to r5 fa0/0 and r6 e0/0
> does it implies that updates should be sent unicast with the use neighbor
> statement.
>
>
>
> Will use of passive default statement accomplish same thing? Using neighbor
> statement the updates will be sent unicast, but suppressing hello with
> passive interface the updates are sent multicast.
>
>
>
> Can some one shed some light on when to use neighbor v/s passive interface
> command.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:07 ART