From: haducbinh (haducbinh@vnpro.org)
Date: Fri Oct 27 2006 - 02:07:40 ART
I configuration on topology and I see the output like your configuration
below:
But the problem is FTP traffic do not get priority over microsoft (445)
This is procedure to reprodure problem:
- Configuration like Scott Morris
- Use FTP and Microsoft (445) to get the same size file between LAN1 and
LAN2
- because FTP traffic higher priority than Microsoft, so FTP should be get
less time than Microsoft to complete job! -> but the time is nearly the
same!!!
R1#sh policy-map int s0/1/0
Serial0/1/0
Service-policy output: POLICY_DEFAULT
Class-map: class-default (match-any)
0 packets, 0 bytes <-- this number increase when I use FTP to
get file
5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
Match: any
Traffic Shaping
Target/Average Byte Sustain Excess Interval Increment
Rate Limit bits/int bits/int (ms) (bytes)
256000/256000 1984 7936 7936 31 992
Adapt Queue Packets Bytes Packets Bytes Shaping
Active Depth Delayed Delayed Active
- 0 0 0 0 0 no
Service-policy : POLICY_FTP
Class-map: CLASS_FTP (match-all)
0 packets, 0 bytes
5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
Match: access-group 100
Queueing
Strict Priority
Output Queue: Conversation 40
Bandwidth 200 (kbps) Burst 5000 (Bytes)
(pkts matched/bytes matched) 0/0
(total drops/bytes drops) 0/0
Class-map: class-default (match-any)
0 packets, 0 bytes
5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
Match: any
HaDucBinh
Mail: haducbinh@vnpro.org or haducbinh@yahoo.com
Phone: +84 908 191 322
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vietnamese Professionals (VnPro)
Cisco Authorised Training
149/1D Ung Van Khiem Street, Ward 25, Binh Thanh District, Ho Chi Minh City
Tel: (08) 5124257 - (08) 5125314
Fax: (08) 5124314
Website: http://vnpro.vn
Support Forum: http://vnpro.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Morris [mailto:swm@emanon.com]
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 11:46 AM
To: 'haducbinh'; alexeim@orcsoftware.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Need QoS Configuration both side?
Did you get any errors on implementation?
When I paste the config in (as expected) I see:
emanon-R4(config-if)#service-policy output POLICY_DEFAULT
I/f shape class CLASS_FTP requested bandwidth 200 (kbps), available only
128 (kbps)
I/f shape class CLASS_FTP requested bandwidth 200 (kbps), available only
128 (kbps)
emanon-R4(config-if)#
You may want to try adjusting your numbers to make it actually work. Using
some show commands help.
A common one:
emanon-R4#sh policy-map
Policy Map POLICY_DEFAULT
Class class-default
Traffic Shaping
Average Rate Traffic Shaping
CIR 128000 (bps) Max. Buffers Limit 1000 (Packets)
service-policy POLICY_FTP
Policy Map POLICY_FTP
Class CLASS_FTP
Strict Priority
Bandwidth 200 (kbps) Burst 5000 (Bytes)
emanon-R4#
Looks like things look good, but doesn't tell us what is implemented.
emanon-R4#sh policy-map ?
WORD policy-map name
control-plane Show Control Plane policy
interface Show Qos Policy Interface
session Show session Qos Policy
| Output modifiers
<cr>
emanon-R4#sh policy-map int s0/1/0
emanon-R4#
Being more specific tells us nothing is actually applied, therefore it's
FIFO or WFQ as default.
To verify. If we fix the numbers, we should see:
emanon-R4#sh policy-map int s0/1/0
Serial0/1/0
Service-policy output: POLICY_DEFAULT
Class-map: class-default (match-any)
0 packets, 0 bytes
5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
Match: any
Traffic Shaping
Target/Average Byte Sustain Excess Interval Increment
Rate Limit bits/int bits/int (ms) (bytes)
256000/256000 1984 7936 7936 31 992
Adapt Queue Packets Bytes Packets Bytes Shaping
Active Depth Delayed Delayed Active
- 0 0 0 0 0 no
Service-policy : POLICY_FTP
Class-map: CLASS_FTP (match-all)
0 packets, 0 bytes
5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
Match: access-group 100
Queueing
Strict Priority
Output Queue: Conversation 40
Bandwidth 200 (kbps) Burst 5000 (Bytes)
(pkts matched/bytes matched) 0/0
(total drops/bytes drops) 0/0
Class-map: class-default (match-any)
0 packets, 0 bytes
5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
Match: any
emanon-R4#
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
IPExpert VP - Curriculum Development
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
smorris@ipexpert.com
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: haducbinh [mailto:haducbinh@vnpro.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 10:20 PM
To: swm@emanon.com; alexeim@orcsoftware.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Need QoS Configuration both side?
I mean FTP port 20,21. Please see my configuration below:
Topology:
LAN1----R1(s0/1/0)---------128kbps--------(s0/1/0)R2--LAN2
LAN1: 172.16.1.0/24
LAN2: 172.16.2.0/24
R1-R2: 192.168.1.0/24
LAN1 and LAN2 using two method to send file, using port 445 (microsoft) and
23(FTP), I want to priority sending at port 23 over port 445, so I
configuration like this:
- R1:
! access 100 match FTP traffic
(config)# access 100 permit tcp any any eq 20
(config)# access 100 permit tcp any any eq 21
(config)# access 100 permit tcp any eq 20 any
(config)# access 100 permit tcp any eq 21 any
(config)# class-map CLASS_FTP
(config-map)# match access-group 100
(config)# policy-map POLICY_FTP
(config-policy)# class CLASS_FTP
(config-policy-class)# priority 200
(config)# policy-map POLICY_DEFAULT
(config-policy)# class class-default
(config-policy-class)# shape average 128000 ! shape to 128kbps
(config-policy-class)# service-policy POLICY_FTP
(config)# int se0/1/0
(config-if)# service-policy output POLICY_DEFAULT
But when I use PC1(belong to LAN1) send the same file to PC2(belong to LAN2)
using: FTP and 445 (microsoft), the FTP do not get priority over microsoft
(port 445) I use this command on R1 to check:
#show policy-map int se0/1
Is show that FTP hit the policy! It mean it match the policy POLICY_FTP but
do not get priority!?????
HaDucBinh
Mail: haducbinh@vnpro.org or haducbinh@yahoo.com
Phone: +84 908 191 322
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vietnamese Professionals (VnPro)
Cisco Authorised Training
149/1D Ung Van Khiem Street, Ward 25, Binh Thanh District, Ho Chi Minh City
Tel: (08) 5124257 - (08) 5125314
Fax: (08) 5124314
Website: http://vnpro.vn
Support Forum: http://vnpro.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Morris [mailto:swm@emanon.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 10:17 PM
To: 'haducbinh'; alexeim@orcsoftware.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Need QoS Configuration both side?
If that's what you have configured, that's the simple part. FTP is port 21
(and 20 for control). Port 23 is telnet. :)
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
IPExpert VP - Curriculum Development
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
smorris@ipexpert.com
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: haducbinh [mailto:haducbinh@vnpro.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 10:20 AM
To: swm@emanon.com; alexeim@orcsoftware.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Need QoS Configuration both side?
The first, thanks Scott Morris!
The second, I have this topology:
LAN1----R1(s0/1/0)---------128kbps--------(s0/1/0)R2--LAN2
LAN1: 172.16.1.0/24
LAN2: 172.16.2.0/24
R1-R2: 192.168.1.0/24
LAN1 and LAN2 using two method to send file, using port 445 (microsoft) and
23(FTP), I want to priority sending at port 23 over port 445, so I
configuration like this:
- R1:
! access 100 match FTP traffic
(config)# access 100 permit tcp any any eq 20 (config)# access 100 permit
tcp any any eq 21 (config)# access 100 permit tcp any eq 20 any (config)#
access 100 permit tcp any eq 21 any
(config)# class-map CLASS_FTP
(config-map)# match access-group 100
(config)# policy-map POLICY_FTP
(config-policy)# class CLASS_FTP
(config-policy-class)# priority 200
(config)# policy-map POLICY_DEFAULT
(config-policy)# class class-default
(config-policy-class)# shape average 128000 ! shape to 128kbps
(config-policy-class)# service-policy POLICY_FTP (config)# int se0/1/0
(config-if)# service-policy output POLICY_DEFAULT
But when I use PC1(belong to LAN1) send the same file to PC2(belong to LAN2)
using: FTP and 445 (microsoft), the FTP do not get priority over microsoft
(port 445) I use this command on R1 to check:
#show policy-map int se0/1
Is show that FTP hit the policy! It mean it match the policy POLICY_FTP but
do not get priority!?????
HaDucBinh
Mail: haducbinh@vnpro.org or haducbinh@yahoo.com
Phone: +84 908 191 322
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vietnamese Professionals (VnPro)
Cisco Authorised Training
149/1D Ung Van Khiem Street, Ward 25, Binh Thanh District, Ho Chi Minh City
Tel: (08) 5124257 - (08) 5125314
Fax: (08) 5124314
Website: http://vnpro.vn
Support Forum: http://vnpro.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Morris [mailto:swm@emanon.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 8:35 PM
To: 'haducbinh'; alexeim@orcsoftware.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Need QoS Configuration both side?
Queuing is ALWAYS outbound. QoS SHOULD be designed for end-to-end
functionality (real-life), although implemented at individual points.
In the lab exam, you only do what is asked. Even in real-life, there may be
situations where you don't need to worry about it (remember, no congestion =
no queuing). But if you get something on your lab that refers to a
conversation between LAN1 and LAN2, I personally would implement the QoS on
both routers.
Overconfiguration (unless prohibited) is not penalized.
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
IPExpert VP - Curriculum Development
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
smorris@ipexpert.com
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
haducbinh
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 3:58 AM
To: alexeim@orcsoftware.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Need QoS Configuration both side?
I also think like you, Alexei. But in some IEWB LAB, it just use LLQ for one
side! So I confuse this too much!
HaDucBinh
Mail: haducbinh@vnpro.org or haducbinh@yahoo.com
Phone: +84 908 191 322
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vietnamese Professionals (VnPro)
Cisco Authorised Training
149/1D Ung Van Khiem Street, Ward 25, Binh Thanh District, Ho Chi Minh City
Tel: (08) 5124257 - (08) 5125314
Fax: (08) 5124314
Website: http://vnpro.vn
Support Forum: http://vnpro.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Alexei Monastyrnyi [mailto:alexeim@orcsoftware.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 2:46 PM
To: haducbinh
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Need QoS Configuration both side?
I think yes, you should. Queuing generally works in outgoing direction, so
having it set up for one side only would improve a quality for that side
while opposite stream (within the same conversation) might suffer with lack
of LLQ.
HTH
A.
haducbinh wrote:
> Hi GS!
>
> This is my topology: (LAN1)------R1(S0/0) ----(FRAME-RELAY)--------
> (S0/0)R2---(LAN2)
>
> User in LAN1 and LAN2 using VoiceIP to communicate, so to ensure that,
Voice
> IP traffic get priority over other traffics
>
> I config LLQ for connection between R1 and R2!
>
> My question is:
>
> Do I need to config LLQ for both side: S0/0 of R1 and S0/0 of R2
>
> or just need to config on one side?
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> HaDucBinh
> Mail: <mailto:haducbinh@vnpro.org> haducbinh@vnpro.org or
> <mailto:haducbinh@yahoo.com> haducbinh@yahoo.com
> Phone: +84 908 191 322
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Vietnamese Professionals (VnPro)
> Cisco Authorised Training
> 149/1D Ung Van Khiem Street, Ward 25, Binh Thanh District, Ho Chi Minh
City
> Tel: (08) 5124257 - (08) 5125314
> Fax: (08) 5124314
> Website: <http://vnpro.vn> http://vnpro.vn Support Forum:
> <http://vnpro.org> http://vnpro.org
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:06 ART