From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Mon Oct 23 2006 - 11:27:20 ART
You are not graded on optimal routing, unless the lab says so.
You are graded on full reachability (generally) based on lab requirements.
So just read, and this will answer your question.
Like I always tell students, the lab MAY explicitly tell you some
redistribution to do, but that may not be the ONLY redistribution, just the
ones they care about exactly where you do something!
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
IPExpert VP - Curriculum Development
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
smorris@ipexpert.com
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Cagri Yucel
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 2:26 AM
To: Group study
Subject: Full connectivity revisited
I think I keep asking the same question but a recent post from some other
member made me think about this:
In the real exam:
1. If a few of the loopbacks or networks are not explicitly told to be
announced. And if I don't do this. What will happen. (Ok in this case I will
ask to the proctor). But what is the scoring approach here. Even if I do
whatever asked in all of the question can I still loose some points because
there is no full connectivity ??? How many points should I expect to loose
for this (whole lab ?) :)
2. Similar question, let's say if I have some suboptimal routing (but no
loops or flapping). All requirements are satisfied, full reachability exists
but will I get some lost of points due to that ?
Am I getting too paronoid ?
-- -cagri
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:06 ART