From: Tandou Mohamed (dtandou@yahoo.com)
Date: Sun Oct 22 2006 - 18:28:57 ART
Scott,
i thought about confederation but i wanted to try something else if i can get the same result.
Thanks a lot
TM
Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
I suppose if the result you came up with yielded the proper results on R8
and BB1's BGP tables, then it would be acceptable.
In a larger network though, it would seem to be a much less scalable
solution to treat everything independent like that. (More administration
work IMHO)
But as the exam is results based, and if you achieved everything that should
work. Like most designs though, I would suggest keeping things as simple as
possible. While life may be complicated at times, the more we set out to
make things even more complicated, the greater the risk of something not
going well!
Just my thoughts.
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
IPExpert VP - Curriculum Development
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
smorris@ipexpert.com
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Tandou Mohamed
Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 9:51 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: IPEXPERT SECTION 27: MULTIPROTOCOL CHALLENGE I
Hello everyone,
Did anyone tried the above lab from IPEXPERT. i am trying to find out if
my answer is acceptable because it is different from their result.
the lab said R1 in AS65511 to peer with R2 on AS 65522
R4,R5, AND R6 IN AS 65522 to peer with R2 but not with each other
R7 is in AS 65533 to peer with R5 's loopback0 interface
R8 in AS 800 to peer to R7 in AS 8888
R1 to peer to BB1 in AS 500
Private AS numbers should not be seen by R8 or BB1
I configured local-as my answer is below
R1
router bgp 65511
no synchronization
bgp log-neighbor-changes
network 192.168.0.0
network 192.168.1.0
network 192.168.2.0
network 192.168.3.0
aggregate-address 192.168.0.0 255.255.252.0 suppress-map MYPREFIX neighbor
150.50.20.2 remote-as 65522 neighbor 150.50.200.2 remote-as 500 neighbor
150.50.200.2 local-as 8888 no-prepend neighbor 150.50.200.2
remove-private-AS no auto-summary
=========================================================================
R7
router bgp 65533
no synchronization
bgp log-neighbor-changes
neighbor 150.50.5.5 remote-as 65522
neighbor 150.50.5.5 ebgp-multihop 4
neighbor 150.50.5.5 update-source Loopback0 neighbor 192.168.10.6
remote-as 800 neighbor 192.168.10.6 local-as 8888 no-prepend neighbor
192.168.10.6 remove-private-AS no auto-summary
When i checked the solution IPEXPERT has confederation configured with
8888 as identifier and 65522, 65511 and 65533 as peers.
Thanks,
TM
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+
countries) for 2"/min or less.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:06 ART