From: Ivan (ivan@iip.net)
Date: Fri Oct 20 2006 - 08:30:30 ART
LONG DEBUG OUTPUT
Paradox.
int f0/0.222 - BW1
int f0/0.223 - BW512
result distrinbution 10:1
R1#sir 50.50.50.5
Routing entry for 50.50.50.0/24
Known via "bgp 1", distance 20, metric 0
Tag 2, type external
Last update from 10.12.222.2 00:01:38 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 10.12.223.2, from 10.12.223.2, 00:01:38 ago
Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
AS Hops 2
Route tag 2
10.12.222.2, from 10.12.222.2, 00:01:38 ago
Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 10
AS Hops 2
Route tag 2
R1#sh run int f0/0.222
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 167 bytes
!
interface FastEthernet0/0.222
bandwidth 1
encapsulation dot1Q 222
ip address 10.12.222.1 255.255.255.0
ip load-sharing per-packet
no snmp trap link-status
end
R1#sh run int f0/0.223
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 169 bytes
!
interface FastEthernet0/0.223
bandwidth 512
encapsulation dot1Q 223
ip address 10.12.223.1 255.255.255.0
ip load-sharing per-packet
no snmp trap link-status
end
R1#ping 50.50.50.7 repeat 50 timeout 1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 50, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 50.50.50.7, timeout is 1 seconds:
.
*Oct 20 16:48:22.899: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.223), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:22.903: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.223), len 100, sending
*Oct 20 16:48:23.911: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:23.919: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending..
*Oct 20 16:48:25.083: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:25.091: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending
*Oct 20 16:48:26.091: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:26.095: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending..
*Oct 20 16:48:27.139: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:27.143: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending
*Oct 20 16:48:28.135: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:28.143: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending..
*Oct 20 16:48:29.183: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:29.187: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending
*Oct 20 16:48:30.183: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:30.187: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending..
*Oct 20 16:48:31.239: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:31.247: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending
*Oct 20 16:48:32.239: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:32.247: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending..
*Oct 20 16:48:33.287: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:33.291: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending
*Oct 20 16:48:34.287: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.223), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:34.295: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.223), len 100, sending..
*Oct 20 16:48:35.331: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:35.335: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending
*Oct 20 16:48:36.335: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:36.339: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending..
*Oct 20 16:48:37.423: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:37.427: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending
*Oct 20 16:48:38.423: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:38.431: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending..
*Oct 20 16:48:39.475: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:39.479: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending
*Oct 20 16:48:40.475: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:40.479: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending..
*Oct 20 16:48:41.523: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:41.531: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending
*Oct 20 16:48:42.523: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:42.531: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending..
*Oct 20 16:48:43.571: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:43.575: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending
*Oct 20 16:48:44.571: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:44.575: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending..
*Oct 20 16:48:45.619: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.223), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:45.623: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.223), len 100, sending
*Oct 20 16:48:46.619: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:46.623: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending..
*Oct 20 16:48:47.667: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:47.671: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending
*Oct 20 16:48:48.663: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:48.671: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending..
*Oct 20 16:48:49.715: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:49.719: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending
*Oct 20 16:48:50.715: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:50.723: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending..
*Oct 20 16:48:51.763: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:51.767: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending
*Oct 20 16:48:52.763: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:52.771: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending..
*Oct 20 16:48:53.811: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:53.815: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending
*Oct 20 16:48:55.511: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:55.519: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending..
*Oct 20 16:48:56.559: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:56.563: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending
*Oct 20 16:48:57.559: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.223), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:57.567: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.223), len 100, sending..
*Oct 20 16:48:58.603: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:58.607: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending
*Oct 20 16:48:59.599: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:48:59.607: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending..
*Oct 20 16:49:00.971: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:49:00.975: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending
*Oct 20 16:49:01.967: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:49:01.975: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending..
*Oct 20 16:49:03.019: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:49:03.027: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending
*Oct 20 16:49:04.019: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:49:04.027: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending..
*Oct 20 16:49:05.067: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:49:05.075: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending
*Oct 20 16:49:06.067: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:49:06.075: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending..
*Oct 20 16:49:07.127: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:49:07.131: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending
*Oct 20 16:49:08.123: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:49:08.131: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending..
*Oct 20 16:49:09.167: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.223), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:49:09.171: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.223), len 100, sending
*Oct 20 16:49:10.167: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:49:10.171: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending..
*Oct 20 16:49:11.215: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:49:11.219: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending
*Oct 20 16:49:12.227: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:49:12.231: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending..
*Oct 20 16:49:13.271: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:49:13.279: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending
*Oct 20 16:49:14.271: IP: tableid=0, s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), routed via FIB
*Oct 20 16:49:14.275: IP: s=10.12.223.1 (local), d=50.50.50.7
(FastEthernet0/0.222), len 100, sending.
Success rate is 0 percent (0/50)
On Thursday 19 October 2006 07:41, Victor C. wrote:
> I had a similar real life problem, I needed to load balance BGP Traffic,
> and the solution was to modify the IGP Cost (I do not remember if I
> modified the OSPF Cost or the link Bandwidth), of the Border Routers that
> had the link to the external neighbors..
>
> Try that to see what happens, maybe it works
>
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] En nombre de Nick
> Griffin
> Enviado el: Miircoles, 18 de Octubre de 2006 11:29 p.m.
> Para: Tim Chan
> CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Asunto: Re: bgp dmzlink-bw verification
>
> Tim, were you ever to make sense out of this? I just did a similar scenario
> and notice the same thing. Anyone have an thoughts/suggestions?
>
> R5#sh ip bgp 100.100.100.0
> BGP routing table entry for 100.100.100.0/24, version 15
> Paths: (2 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
> Multipath: eBGP iBGP
> Not advertised to any peer
> 900
> 192.168.75.7 from 192.168.75.7 (192.168.97.7)
> Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, multipath, best
> DMZ-Link Bw 12 kbytes
> 900
> 192.168.85.8 from 192.168.85.8 (192.168.98.8)
> Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, multipath
> DMZ-Link Bw 1 kbytes
>
>
> R5#sh ip route 100.100.100.0
> Routing entry for 100.100.100.0/24
> Known via "bgp 1000", distance 200, metric 0
> Tag 900, type internal
> Last update from 192.168.85.8 00:06:08 ago
> Routing Descriptor Blocks:
> 192.168.75.7, from 192.168.75.7, 00:06:08 ago
> Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
> AS Hops 1
> * 192.168.85.8, from 192.168.85.8, 00:06:08 ago
> Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 12
> AS Hops 1
>
> On 10/17/06, Tim Chan <timanji@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm trying to understand the output I'm getting when I configure "bgp
> > dmzlink-bw".
> > After my configuration is done, I get the following output:
> > R2#sho ip bgp 0.0.0.0
> > BGP routing table entry for 0.0.0.0/0, version 32
> > Paths: (2 available, best #2, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
> > Multipath: iBGP
> > Flag: 0x800
> > Advertised to non peer-group peers:
> > 145.1.245.5
> > 100,
> > (Received from a RR-client)
> > 145.1.245.5 from 145.1.245.5 (150.1.5.5)
> > Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, multipath
> > DMZ-Link
> > Bw 1 kbytes
> > 100, (Received from a RR-client)
> > 145.1.245.4 from
> > 145.1.245.4 (150.1.4.4)
> > Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid,
> > internal, multipath, best
> > DMZ-Link Bw 1250 kbytes
> >
> > You can see that the
> > route to R5 is 1kbps and R4 is 1250kbps.
> >
> > So when I do a "show ip route", I
> > get the following:
> > R2#sho ip route 0.0.0.0
> > Routing entry for 0.0.0.0/0,
> > supernet
> > Known via "bgp 200", distance 200, metric 0, candidate default path
> > Tag 100, type internal
> > Last update from 145.1.245.4 00:00:28 ago
> > Routing
> > Descriptor Blocks:
> > * 145.1.245.5, from 145.1.245.5, 00:00:28 ago
> > Route
> > metric is 0, traffic share count is 10
> > AS Hops 1
> > 145.1.245.4, from
> > 145.1.245.4, 00:00:28 ago
> > Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
> > AS Hops 1
> >
> > Note that I'm getting a traffic share count of 10:1. Which looks
> > good, BUT, the 10 is
> > towards the slower link, not the faster one. So normally
> > I would read this as, "For every
> > 10 packets sent to R5, send 1 packet to R4."
> > But this makes no sense!
> >
> > In looking at the doccd, the output in the examples
> > follows what makes sense. The faster
> > links get the larger ratios.
>
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft/12
>2 t
>
> > /122t2/ftbgplb.htm#wp1052316
> >
> > This is from IE Vol2 Lab 6, task 4.9. And even
> > their verification output shows the same
> > 10:1 favor over the slower link. Are
> > these outputs correct and I'm just reading it wrong?
> > (But then the doccd shows
> > otherwise)
> >
> > Please advise...
> > -Tim
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
-- Ivan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:06 ART