From: Brian Dennis (bdennis@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Thu Oct 12 2006 - 13:53:01 ART
The solutions aren't the same as the "frame-relay tc" command is used
for Frame Relay SVC's and not Frame Relay PVC's. Here is a quote from
the DocCD:
You must enable Frame Relay switching using the frame-relay switching
global command before the frame-relay tc command will be effective on
switched PVCs.
HTH,
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
srdja blagojevic
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 4:14 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: FRTS: Tc and Bc (IEWB vol1 lab7 task 8.2)
FR map for this task from solution guide is:
!
map-class frame-relay DLCI_504
frame-relay cir 768000
frame-relay bc 7680
frame-relay fragment 960
My solution was:
map-class frame-relay DLCI_504
frame-relay cir 768000
frame-relay tc 10
frame-relay fragment 960
I thought that since CIR=Bc/Tc, these two solution are the same.
Unfortunately, with sh traffic-shape, I found out that in the first case
Tc
is 10 ms and in the second case is 63 ms. What is the purpose of this
command (frame-relay tc 10)if I can not set Tc with it?
What am I missing here? Why these two configurations are not generating
same
show traffic-shape output?
Any good link explaining this difference?
TIA,
Srdja
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:05 ART