Re: %TCP-6-BADAUTH: No MD5 digest

From: Alexei Monastyrnyi (alexeim@orcsoftware.com)
Date: Wed Oct 11 2006 - 17:37:03 ART


"TCP-6-BADAUTH"
RIP talks UDP... :-)

just my 2 cents .. I payed high price twice missing such small details
on the final push :-)

A.

Keith Bizzell wrote:
> I'm seeing a strange issue with RIP. This showed up on IE Core 1 between R1
> and R4. It's a simple RIP authentication using MD5. I recieve all my
> routes on R1 from R4, but this error keeps popping up. R1 is a 2611XM
> running 12.4 advanced enterprise. I think this is just a bug, but I'm not
> sure. From the output below, you can see RIP is working:
>
> *Mar 2 23:16:40.485: RIP: sending v2 update to 224.0.0.9 via
> FastEthernet0/0 (140.1.14.1)
> *Mar 2 23:16:40.485: RIP: Update contains 1 routes
> *Mar 2 23:16:40.485: RIP: Update queued
> *Mar 2 23:16:40.485: RIP: Update sent via FastEthernet0/0
> Rack1R1(config-router)#
> *Mar 2 23:16:45.998: %TCP-6-BADAUTH: No MD5 digest from 140.1.14.4(179) to
> 140.1.14.1(47046) (RST)
> Rack1R1(config-router)#
> *Mar 2 23:16:48.230: RIP: received v2 update from 140.1.14.4 on
> FastEthernet0/0
> *Mar 2 23:16:48.230: RIP: Update contains 18 routes
>
> Any ideas on why I'm getting that bad auth?
>
> Thanks,
> Keith
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:05 ART