RE: Shape Average command

From: Michael Zuo (mzuo@ixiacom.com)
Date: Wed Oct 11 2006 - 14:50:35 ART

• Next message: Joe Chang: "Re: CCIE Numbers Flying......."
• Previous message: Michael Zuo: "RE: OT Jobs in Europe"
• Maybe in reply to: Michael Zuo: "Shape Average command"
• Next in thread: Vincent Mashburn: "RE: Shape Average command"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Thanks the reply.

The Cisco doc says "If the traffic being sent to the network must
strictly conform to the configured network provisioned CIR, then you
should use average traffic shaping."

This sort of leads back to my original question. If the "shape average"
is used to confirm traffic to CIR, what is the purpose of allowing "be"
to be specified? Is there a special scenario the "be" parameter is
needed?

thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Leon van Dongen [mailto:l.dongen1@chello.nl]
Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2006 4:09 AM
To: Michael Zuo
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Shape Average command

Michael,

The shape average command does allow excess burst traffic to be sent
when Be is configured.

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios124/124cr/hq
os_r/qos_s1h.htm#wp1085303

HTH

--Leon

Michael Zuo wrote:
> Hi group,
>
>
> i am just curious, if the "shape average" command only allow Bc to be
sent out
> each timing interval, why does it allow user to specify Be parameter?
>
> thanks in advance...
>
>

• Next message: Joe Chang: "Re: CCIE Numbers Flying......."
• Previous message: Michael Zuo: "RE: OT Jobs in Europe"
• Maybe in reply to: Michael Zuo: "Shape Average command"
• Next in thread: Vincent Mashburn: "RE: Shape Average command"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:05 ART