From: Alexei Monastyrnyi (alexeim@orcsoftware.com)
Date: Sun Oct 08 2006 - 06:17:00 ART
Hi.
From further tasks you may look for indirect references for mutual
redistribution. Like one of EIGRP routers should prefer OSPF routes via
its EIGRP mate and fall back to OSPF mates in case of failure.
Or even more odd, a multicast layout depends on route redistribution and
at some point you realize you have to introduce mroute.... here is a
good point to ask yourself "do I have a correct redistribution across
the board?"... Well, a bit late time wise, since you have to go from
multicast section back to your IGP redistribution, so it is better to
think ahead. :-)
If it is still not clear, I would say you'd better ask if mutual
redistribution is meant here. Many things may be dependent on it.
HTH
A.
Chris Broadway wrote:
> Group,
>
> I was sitting here enjoy a nice rainy day doing labs when I thought of
> something. Lets say you have a network with rip, OSPF, and EIGRP. There is
> a very general stated requirement to redistribute mutually OSPF and EIGRP.
> There are two routers in the topology that have EIGRP and OSPF on them. In
> this task, there is no explicit instructions to mutually redistribute on
> both routers...Does this mean, that only doing it on one, as long as the
> whole EIGRP table gets into OSPF and vice verse, would be considered a
> correct solution? I want your thoughts on whether this is a good idea,
> maybe a crafted proctor question, or I should stop thinking for the day.
>
> -Broadway
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:04 ART