From: Radioactive Frog (pbhatkoti@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Oct 07 2006 - 10:39:00 ART
I am trying to simulate the following
-----------------------------------------------------
10.1.1.20(PC1)------vlan1--------3550-------------PIX--------------Internet
|
20.1.1.20(PC2)------vlan2----------|
On PIX I am still getting the traffic of more then 1 megs. It seems the
bandwidth doesn't works.
access-list 10 permit 10.1.1.20
access-list 20 permit 20.1.1.20
mls qos
class-map match-all 10
match access-group 10
class-map match-all 20
match access-group 20
!
!
policy-map internet
class 10
bandwidth 512
class 20
bandwidth 512
3) Interface gig0/12
bandwidth 1024
service-policy output internet
I have also tried the following method but on PIX I was still able to see
the full traffic (not shapped 512).
policy-map WAN-EDGE
class VOICE
priority percent 18 ! Voice gets 552 kbps of LLQ
class INTERACTIVE-VIDEO
priority percent 15 ! 384 kbps IP/VC needs 460 kbps of LLQ
class CALL-SIGNALING
bandwidth percent 5 ! BW guarantee for Call-Signaling
class NETWORK-CONTROL
bandwidth percent 5 ! Routing and Network Management
get min 5% BW
class CRITICAL-DATA
bandwidth percent 27 ! Critical Data gets min 27% BW
random-detect dscp-based ! Enables DSCP-WRED for
Critical-Data class
class BULK-DATA
bandwidth percent 4 ! Bulk Data gets min 4% BW guarantee
random-detect dscp-based ! Enables DSCP-WRED for Bulk-Data class
class SCAVENGER
bandwidth percent 1 ! Scavenger class is throttled
class class-default
bandwidth percent 25 ! Default class gets a 25% BW guarantee
random-detect ! Enables WRED on class-default
! Interface commands
max-reserved-bandwidth 100 ! Overrides the default 75% BW limit
service-policy output WAN-EDGE ! apply outbound policy map
Can anyone shed a light on this what I am doing wrong?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:04 ART