From: Andy (and123and@googlemail.com)
Date: Fri Oct 06 2006 - 06:32:42 ART
If it said
"distribute the remaining bandwidth among other classes"
then I would assume this to be wfq, or should I still be asking the proctor?
On 06/10/06, sabrina pittarel <sabri_esame@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> mmmh,
>
> "distribute the remaining bandwidth among the remaining traffic"
>
> I
> didn't read it under that note before...that may sound like WFQ, but I
> wonder
> if it only means to let all the other traffic go to the default class and
> we
> are over reading the question. It doesn't say distribute *fairly* the
> remaining bandwidth (which would be a clear hint to WFQ).
>
> But, neverless
> this is a good doubt to have and an appropriate question for the proctor.
> Sabrina
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Alex De Gruiter (AU)
> <Alex.deGruiter@didata.com.au>
> To: sabrina pittarel <sabri_esame@yahoo.com>
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2006 5:42:13 PM
> Subject:
> RE: max-reserved-bandwidth?
>
> Right... I think I'm getting it. I definitely had
> misinterpretations of
> the max-reserved-bandwidth command! I actually thought
> for some odd
> reason that the maximum bandwidth available was 75% unless
> max-reserved
> was entered - in hindsight that was a little silly of me!
>
> On
> the note of "rest of traffic", if you were asked in the exam to
> distribute the
> remaining bandwidth among the remaining traffic, would
> you employ a queuing
> strategy for class-default (such as fair-queuing),
> or would you use FIFO? If
> the exam doesn't stipulate either way, is
> there a preference?
> ________________________________
>
> From: sabrina pittarel
> [mailto:sabri_esame@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Friday, 6 October 2006 10:32 AM
> To: Alex
> De Gruiter (AU); ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: max-reserved-bandwidth?
> You have at least to set max-reserved-bandwidth to 90% (20 + 40 + 30),
> otherwise you won't be able to apply the policy map on the interface.
> The 10%
> will be left for overhead and rest of traffic.
>
> Sabrina
>
>
> ----- Original
> Message ----
> From: Alex De Gruiter (AU) <Alex.deGruiter@didata.com.au>
> To:
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2006 3:21:33 PM
> Subject:
> max-reserved-bandwidth?
>
>
> Hey Guys,
>
> I have a question - I searched the
> archives and found a similar
> reference, however I wasn't satisfied that the
> answer was definitively
> defined.
>
> If a question in the lab asks us to use
> CBWFQ in such a way as to
> provide the following bandwidth allocations:
>
> Class
> A : 20%
> Class B : 40%
> Class C : 30%
>
> Then, distribute the remaining bandwidth
> among other classes, do we need
> to modify the max-reserved-bandwidth? I tried
> this in my home lab and
> received an error relating to the bandwidth available
> (which, by
> default, is 75%).
>
> What does everyone think? When would we need to
> change
> max-reserved-bandwidth?
>
> Alex
> ************************************************************************
> ******
> - NOTICE FROM DIMENSION DATA AUSTRALIA
> This message is confidential,
> and may contain proprietary or legally
> privileged information. If you have
> received this email in error,
> please notify the sender and delete it
> immediately.
>
> Internet communications are not secure. You should scan this
> message and
> any attachments for viruses. Under no circumstances do we accept
> liability for any loss or damage which may result from your receipt of
> this
> message or any attachments.
> ************************************************************************
> ******
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:04 ART