From: Alex De Gruiter \(AU\) (Alex.deGruiter@didata.com.au)
Date: Fri Oct 06 2006 - 02:07:41 ART
As an example, to cite a mail from Brian (M) - subjet "IEWB Lab 18 Task
8.1":
************************************
You can police your traffic outbound but typically in practical
implementations you'd find that it makes more sense to shape your
traffic. Why drop your own outbound traffic when you have the
possibility to send it a few milliseconds or seconds later? Within the
case of the lab I would talk to the proctor if you are confused about
semantics like this.
************************************
I had a very similar scenario (not exactly the same, but very much along
these lines in terms of grey area). When I asked the proctor I was told
to read the question. The trouble was that the question was not
sufficiently clear to really indicate which option I should take. I'm
really quite concerned about taking the lab again with this in mind; and
considering a different lab location if it means a different proctor.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Alex De Gruiter (AU)
Sent: Friday, 6 October 2006 2:47 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Proctor help?
Hey Guys,
I've read many, many times on this list people mentioning that the
"proctor is your friend" and if you need clarification the "proctor is
there to help". Well, I recently sat (and failed) the lab exam; I
evidently wasn't as ready for the lab as I thought I was - that's cool,
I know the areas I need to improve. However I do have a question along
the lines of proctor assistance - or lack thereof.
Literally every time I asked a question in my lab, I was told "Read the
question" (a rather redundant activity I thought, given that I was
referencing the question in my line of enquiry!). Now, I don't expect
the proctor to give the answer away, not at all, but I am confused by
comments about how helpful the proctor was. I actually reached a point
with my proctor where I gave up asking questions because I already knew
the answer: "read the question".
I can't give concrete examples due to the NDA, however I know for a fact
that there were at least 3 or 4 questions that could be answered using
more than 1 methodology. However the proctor told me, in no uncertain
terms, that he would not assist in my choice. Has anyone had similar
experiences with proctors? In these situations, are we marked down for
choosing a methodology other than the one Cisco expected us to use?
Alex
************************************************************************
******
- NOTICE FROM DIMENSION DATA AUSTRALIA
This message is confidential, and may contain proprietary or legally
privileged information. If you have received this email in error,
please notify the sender and delete it immediately.
Internet communications are not secure. You should scan this message and
any attachments for viruses. Under no circumstances do we accept
liability for any loss or damage which may result from your receipt of
this message or any attachments.
************************************************************************
******
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:04 ART