Q. on frame relay fragmentation

From: sabrina pittarel (sabri_esame@yahoo.com)
Date: Sun Oct 01 2006 - 15:16:39 ART

• Next message: Scott Morris: "RE: Q. on frame relay fragmentation"
• Previous message: Scott Morris: "RE: ospf authentication"
• Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: Q. on frame relay fragmentation"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: Q. on frame relay fragmentation"
• Maybe reply: sabrina pittarel: "Re: Q. on frame relay fragmentation"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: Q. on frame relay fragmentation"
• Maybe reply: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: Q. on frame relay fragmentation"
• Maybe reply: sabrina pittarel: "Re: Q. on frame relay fragmentation"
• Maybe reply: Roberto Fernandez: "RE: Q. on frame relay fragmentation"
• Maybe reply: Radoslav Vasilev: "Re: Q. on frame relay fragmentation"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi,
I was reading about frame relay fragmentation and everywhere in the
documentation I read that voice packets should not be fragmented...
Why is
that?

Sabrina

• Next message: Scott Morris: "RE: Q. on frame relay fragmentation"
• Previous message: Scott Morris: "RE: ospf authentication"
• Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: Q. on frame relay fragmentation"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: Q. on frame relay fragmentation"
• Maybe reply: sabrina pittarel: "Re: Q. on frame relay fragmentation"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: Q. on frame relay fragmentation"
• Maybe reply: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: Q. on frame relay fragmentation"
• Maybe reply: sabrina pittarel: "Re: Q. on frame relay fragmentation"
• Maybe reply: Roberto Fernandez: "RE: Q. on frame relay fragmentation"
• Maybe reply: Radoslav Vasilev: "Re: Q. on frame relay fragmentation"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:03 ART