Re: Interesting question about QoS DROP!

From: Petr Lapukhov (petr@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Sat Sep 30 2006 - 13:41:33 ART

Back in days there was no "uncoditional discard" in MQC. It has become
available only
since 12.2(13)T

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6350/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00804559b3.html

That is, until 12.2T people used policer to drop traffic :) Nowdays, you
have two
options - modern "drop" or "deprecated" policer.

HTH

2006/9/30, Stefan Grey <examplebrain@hotmail.com>:
>
> Hello guys!
>
> This question I just can't get for very long time.....
> The general task is: Drop some traffic on output and traffic is receive
> on
> input interface.
> output - R1- input.
>
> The solution is:
> class-map SOMECLASS
>
> policy-map SOMEPOLICY
> class SOMECLASS
> police 8000 conform-action drop exceed-action drop
>
> or:
>
> policy-map SOMEPOLICY
> class SOMECLASS
> drop
>
> int outside
> servicepolicy output SOMEPOLICY.
>
> Are both solutiions correct?? Why to chose the first one or the second??
> In
> which case which is more preffered?? I have done tons of scenarios but in
> different workbboks different way is chosen.
>
> Thanks,
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Customise your home page with RSS feeds at MSN Ireland! http://ie.msn.com/
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> 

-- 
Petr Lapukhov, CCIE #16379
petr@internetworkexpert.com

Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Outside US: 775-826-4344

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 01 2006 - 16:55:41 ART