From: Alexei Monastyrnyi (alexeim@orcsoftware.com)
Date: Sat Sep 30 2006 - 11:13:45 ART
Hi there.
no fair
under serial interface does the trick
HTH
A.
on 9/30/2006 2:01 PM Radoslav Vasilev wrote:
> Hi Group,
>
> I'm trying to separate two classes of traffic over two separate PVC
> over a single link (back to back between two routers). The idea is to
> later use PIPQ and test connectivity while checking the queueing with
> PIPQ.
>
> R4 and R5 connected back-to-back over interfaces serial 0/1 on each:
>
> R4:
>
> frame-relay switching
>
> interface Serial0/1
> ip address 192.168.100.4 255.255.255.0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> clock rate 128000
> frame-relay priority-dlci-group 1 100 101 101 101
> frame-relay intf-type dce
> end
>
> access-list 100 permit icmp any any
> access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq telnet
> access-list 101 permit tcp any eq telnet any
> priority-list 1 protocol ip high list 101
> priority-list 1 protocol ip low list 100
>
> R5:
>
> frame-relay switching
>
> interface Serial0/1
> ip address 192.168.100.5 255.255.255.0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> load-interval 30
> frame-relay priority-dlci-group 1 100 101 101 101
> end
>
> access-list 100 permit icmp any any
> access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq telnet
> access-list 101 permit tcp any eq telnet any
> priority-list 1 protocol ip high list 101
> priority-list 1 protocol ip low list 100
>
> As seen above, i want to use DLCI 100 for telnet traffic (two-way) and
> DLCI 101 for icmp traffic.
>
> I'm testing with pinging/telneting to R4 from R5,here's the debug on R4:
>
> while telneting from R5:
> Rack1R4# 1 00:59:45.659: Serial0/1(i): dlci 101(0x1851), pkt type
> 0x800, datagramsize 45
> *Mar 1 00:59:45.763: Serial0/1(o): dlci 101(0x1851), pkt type
> 0x800(IP), datagramsize 44
> *Mar 1 00:59:45.767: Serial0/1(i): dlci 101(0x1851), pkt type 0x800,
> datagramsize 45
> *Mar 1 00:59:45.975: Serial0/1(o): dlci 101(0x1851), pkt type
> 0x800(IP), datagramsize 44
> *Mar 1 00:59:45.983: Serial0/1(i): dlci 101(0x1851), pkt type 0x800,
> datagramsize 46
> *Mar 1 00:59:45.983: Serial0/1(o): dlci 101(0x1851), pkt type
> 0x800(IP), datagramsize 54
>
>
> whilte pinging from R5:
> *Mar 1 01:00:18.099: Serial0/1(o): dlci 101(0x1851), pkt type
> 0x800(IP), datagramsize 104
> *Mar 1 01:00:18.115: Serial0/1(i): dlci 101(0x1851), pkt type 0x800,
> datagramsize 104
> *Mar 1 01:00:18.115: Serial0/1(o): dlci 101(0x1851), pkt type
> 0x800(IP), datagramsize 104
> *Mar 1 01:00:18.131: Serial0/1(i): dlci 101(0x1851), pkt type 0x800,
> datagramsize 104
> *Mar 1 01:00:18.131: Serial0/1(o): dlci 101(0x1851), pkt type
> 0x800(IP), datagramsize 104
> *Mar 1 01:00:18.151: Serial0/1(i): dlci 101(0x1851), pkt type 0x800,
> datagramsize 104
>
> So it looks like the normal priority queue is selected...
>
> Rack1R5#sh frame-relay map
> Serial0/1 (up): ip 192.168.100.4 dlci 100(0x64,0x1840), dynamic,
> broadcast,, status defined, active
> Priority DLCI Group 1, DLCI 100 (HIGH), DLCI 101 (MEDIUM)
> DLCI 101 (NORMAL), DLCI 101 (LOW)
>
> Any ideas?
> Thaks
> Rado
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 01 2006 - 16:55:41 ART