From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Fri Sep 29 2006 - 11:07:11 ART
There are both (script + human). The script is used to verify connectivity
(TCL most likely) and to verify things that are ABSOLUTE in nature. E.g. if
you were told not to have any static routes, and "show run | in ip route"
gives output, then you lose points. The script is supposed to measure
things that are simple in that nature.
So you may find that a script can determine you lost 'x' number of points
before a human touches it. Now, if the script comes back and says you lost
50 points, even though a human does read it, I would likely say that there
wouldn't be much effort because there isn't grey area there! Anything not
absolute though is looked at by a human.
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
IPExpert VP - Curriculum Development
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
smorris@ipexpert.com
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Duane Dewitt
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 9:56 AM
To: Daniel Fredrick; Brian Dennis
Cc: David Redfern (AU); ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Lab Rereads
Does this imply that the first time your exam is marked it only goes through
the script? I was under the impression the proctor does this every time an
exam is marked.
Regards
Duane
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Daniel Fredrick
Sent: 29 September 2006 03:32 PM
To: Brian Dennis
Cc: David Redfern (AU); ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Lab Rereads
Yes... I agree with Brian. I work with one of the proctors. He stated that
when they are regrading the exam, they are actually reading the Lab manual
that you had during your exam, instead of just reading an answer key, typing
a show command, and looking at the correct output noted on the answer key.
I was very happy to hear this, because when you ask a proctor over and over
on a question, and make sure they are interpreting the question the same way
you are, then you get it wrong because of a computer. With a regrade, you
get a human to think about the question again, hopefully the same way the
proctor and you did to begin with.
Dan
On 9/29/06, Brian Dennis <bdennis@internetworkexpert.com> wrote:
>
> Also let me add that I have seen a couple people pass recently on a
> regrade.
>
> HTH,
>
> Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
> bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com <http://www.internetworkexpert.com/>
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com ] On Behalf
Of
> Brian Dennis
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 9:51 PM
> To: David Redfern (AU); ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Lab Rereads
>
> David,
> Rerunning a script wouldn't make sense as the script would
> theoretically output the same results. You can expect a proctor to
look
> over your lab in detail.
>
> HTH,
>
> Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
> bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com <http://www.internetworkexpert.com/>
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> David Redfern (AU)
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 9:19 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Lab Rereads
>
> Does anyone know whether the lab rereads are performed in the same
> manner as the initial grading (scripts ect) or using another method (
> eg, manual grading)?
>
>
>
>
************************************************************************
> *****
> *
> - NOTICE FROM DIMENSION DATA AUSTRALIA This message is confidential,
> and may contain proprietary or legally privileged information. If you
> have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete
> it immediately.
>
> Internet communications are not secure. You should scan this message
and
> any
> attachments for viruses. Under no circumstances do we accept
liability
> for
> any loss or damage which may result from your receipt of this message
or
> any
> attachments.
>
************************************************************************
> *****
> *
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 01 2006 - 16:55:41 ART