From: Frank (ocsic@web.de)
Date: Mon Sep 25 2006 - 09:45:21 ART
msaeed@uaeu.ac.ae schrieb:
Hi,
it worked for me also. If you don't have any problems later on with
multicast
or anything else, thats ok.
Frank
> Hi all,
>
> Is it mandatory to use Multilink interface? As I have this solution, and
> here is the output of #sh ppp multilink
>
> R2
>
> conf t
> username Rack1R3 password 0 CISCO
> interface Virtual-Template1
> ip address 174.1.23.2 255.255.255.0
> ppp authentication chap
> ppp chap hostname Rack1R2
> ppp chap password 0 CISCO
> ppp multilink
> interface Serial0
> no ip address
> encapsulation frame-relay
> frame-relay traffic-shaping
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> !
> interface Serial0.203 point-to-point
> frame-relay interface-dlci 203 ppp Virtual-Template1
> !
> interface Serial0.213 point-to-point
> frame-relay interface-dlci 213 ppp Virtual-Template1
> end
> wr
>
> R3
>
> conf t
> username Rack1R2 password 0 CISCO
> interface Virtual-Template1
> ip address 174.1.23.3 255.255.255.0
> ppp authentication chap
> ppp chap hostname Rack1R3
> ppp chap password 0 CISCO
> ppp multilink
> interface Serial0/0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> frame-relay traffic-shaping
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> frame-relay interface-dlci 302 ppp Virtual-Template1
> !
> interface Serial0/1
> encapsulation frame-relay
> frame-relay traffic-shaping
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> frame-relay interface-dlci 312 ppp Virtual-Template1
> end
> wr
>
> Rack1R3#sh ppp multilink
>
> Virtual-Access5, bundle name is Rack1R2
> Bundle up for 00:04:58, 1/255 load
> Receive buffer limit 24384 bytes, frag timeout 1000 ms
> 0/0 fragments/bytes in reassembly list
> 0 lost fragments, 0 reordered
> 0/0 discarded fragments/bytes, 0 lost received
> 0x0 received sequence, 0x0 sent sequence
> Member links: 2 (max not set, min not set)
> Vi3, since 00:04:58
> Vi4, since 00:04:55
>
> Rack1R2#sh ppp multilink
>
> Virtual-Access5, bundle name is Rack1R3
> Bundle up for 00:07:33, 1/255 load
> Receive buffer limit 24384 bytes, frag timeout 1000 ms
> 0/0 fragments/bytes in reassembly list
> 0 lost fragments, 0 reordered
> 0/0 discarded fragments/bytes, 0 lost received
> 0x0 received sequence, 0x0 sent sequence
> Member links: 2 (max not set, min not set)
> Vi1, since 00:07:33
> Vi2, since 00:07:30
>
> You can see that router has created Virtual-Access5 interface to bundle
> two Virtual-Access interfaces, does any one see any problem in this
> solution?
>
> Regards,
>
> Mohammad Zahid Saeed
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 01 2006 - 16:55:41 ART