From: Radoslav Vasilev (deckland@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Sep 23 2006 - 07:18:20 ART
No - not really.
If you need to keep the L3 physical interface, that would be the answer.
The closest thing comming to my mind would be ``fallback briding`` but
that would provide connecitivity for non-routed protocols. Still you
can see similar scenarious in some labs.
Rado
On 9/22/06, 2nd CCIE <doubleccie@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Folks
> I have a confusion here
>
> R1----------------------(f0/1)SW(f0/5)---------PC
>
> R1 is connected to L3 port of the 3550 switch
>
> R1 fast ethernet port is 10.1.1.1 /24
> Fast0/1 on Sw is configured as L3 port with IP addres 10.1.1.2/24
>
> !
> interface FastEthernet0/1
> description To R1
> no switchport
> ip address 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
> !
>
> I wonder , is there anyway that i put the PC on the same subnet with both the switch and the router ?? say ip add 10.1.1.5/24 ??
>
> appreciate any input
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Yahoo! Small Business.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 01 2006 - 16:55:41 ART