From: Marvin Greenlee (marvingreenlee@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Sep 22 2006 - 16:32:07 ART
Danger, danger
"Match all" is probably NOT what you want to use with
multiple protocols listed, and usually will end up
matching nothing. "Match any" would probably be
better for this case. Also, bandwidth percent is
allocating a minimum percentage. Policing would
probably be a better option as you probably want to
set an upper limit (maximum) for this traffic, not a
lower limit.
Thanks,
Marvin
--- CCIE 4 Me <ccie4me@inbox.lv> wrote:
> Rabii,
>
> Protocol NBAR will be your best bet, so your
> research should be in that
> direction, a few command syntax like these should
> get you going:
>
> class-map match-all p2p-file-sharing
> match protocol fasttrack
> match protocol gnutella
> match protocol kazaa2
> !
> policy-map p2p
> class p2p-file-sharing
> bandwidth percent 5
> !
> interface fa0/0
> service-policy output p2p
> !
>
> HTH
>
> Godswill Oletu
> CCIE #16464 (R&S)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rabii NOUR" <nour.rabii@marocconnect.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 6:53 AM
> Subject: peer-to-peer
>
>
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> >
> > I would like to manage the peer-to-peer traffic
> appliying a Qos to limit
> the
> > BW utilisation in cisco router, any idea about
> matching this kind of
> traffic
> > and configuration example.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 01 2006 - 16:55:41 ART