From: Angelo De Guzman (a.deguzman@wesolv.ph.fujitsu.com)
Date: Fri Sep 15 2006 - 06:08:00 ART
Hi All,
Ooops. Sorry guys for the spam. I am getting nervous my exam is next week.
The link between R2 and R5 (Serial) must place all WEB traffic into a
priority queue allowing FULL BW between 6PM and 8AM on weekdays. Outside of
this time all web traffic must be treated as best effort.
My Answers
1.
!---> covers 12:OO midnight to 7:59 AM and 6PM to 12Midnight
time-range HIGH_WWW
periodic weekdays 18:00 to 23:59
periodic weekdays 0:00 to 7:59
!
access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq www time-range HIGH_WWW
access-list 102 permit ip any any
priority-list 1 protocol ip high list 101
priority-list 2 protocol ip normal list 102 <--- i dont know if this is Best
Effort in priority-queue
2.
access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq www time-range HIGH_WWW
!
class-map match-all HIGH_WWW
match access-group 101
!
!
policy-map R2_R5
class HIGH_WWW
priority percent 100 <---- if it is www and okays time range then it is
prioritized
class class-default
!
int s0/0/1
service-policy output R2_R5
1. Which is better solution?
2. Is # 2 a valid logic?
2. Is there a default queueing or action for the default class?
Your thoughts please and corrections.
TIA
Angelo De Guzman (9/15/06 4:48 PM):
>
>Hi All,
> The link between R2 and R5 (Serial) must place all WEB traffic into a
>priority queue allowing FULL BW between 6PM and 8AM on weekdays. Outside of
>this time all web traffic must be treated as best effort.
>
>My Answers
>1.
>!---> covers 12:OO midnight to 7:59 AM and 6PM to 12Midnight
>time-range HIGH_WWW
> periodic weekdays 18:00 to 23:59
> periodic weekdays 0:00 to 7:59
>!---> covers time from 8:00 AM to 6PM where WWW and probably others would be
>treated as best effort
>time-range LOW_WWW_ANY
> periodic weekdays 8:00 to 17:59
> periodic weekend 0:00 to 23:59
>!
>access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq www time-range HIGH_WWW
>access-list 102 permit ip any any time-range LOW_WWW_ANY
>priority-list 1 protocol ip high list 101
>priority-list 2 protocol ip normal list 102 <--- i dont know if this is Best
>Effort in priority-queue
>
>2.
>access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq www time-range HIGH_WWW
>!
>class-map match-all HIGH_WWW
> match access-group 101
>class-map match-all BestEffort
> match not access-group 101
>!
>!
>policy-map LOW_BW
> class BestEffort
> police 8000 < ---- some action that I just made up for the "best Effort" but
>I dont know if correct.
>policy-map R2_R5
> class HIGH_WWW
> priority percent 100 <---- if it is www and okays time range then it is
>prioritized
> class class-default
> service-policy LOW_BW
>
>int s0/0/1
> service-policy output R2_R5
>
>1. Which is better solution?
>2. Is # 2 a valid logic?
>2. Is there a default queueing or action for the default class?
> Your thoughts please and corrections.
>
>TIA
>
>
>***********************
>No virus was detected in the attachment no filename
>
>Your mail has been scanned by InterScan MSS.
>***********-***********
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>***********************
>No virus was detected in the attachment no filename
>
>Your mail has been scanned by InterScan MSS.
>***********-***********
>
***********************
No virus was detected in the attachment no filename
Your mail has been scanned by InterScan MSS.
***********-***********
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 01 2006 - 16:55:40 ART