CAR without excess burst

From: Mengdi Cao (xianglingzj@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Sep 14 2006 - 01:25:48 ART

• Next message: Chee Chew Leong: "per-port per-vlan on 3560"
• Previous message: sabrina pittarel: "Re: Multiple OSPF keys on Hub and Spoke Frame Relay"
• Next in thread: Arun Arumuganainar: "Re: CAR without excess burst"
• Maybe reply: Arun Arumuganainar: "Re: CAR without excess burst"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi, All,

This maybe stupid but just want to know whether CAR can support rate limit
without Be?
I am quite confused by Cisco's statements. It explains burst-max as excess
burst (be) but in its detail explaination it use another word "extended
burst" and it seems for me that burst-max is actually (bc+be). Anyone can
tell me which one is true?

More over, according to Cisco document burst-normal has a minumum of max
(1000, bps/2000) and burst-max has a min of max (2000, bps/2000). Thus no
matter burst-max is be or bc+be, on low speed link it is not possible to
configure be = 0. Is there a "wise" solution to this? Or I have to use CB
policing/shaping ? thanks.

• Next message: Chee Chew Leong: "per-port per-vlan on 3560"
• Previous message: sabrina pittarel: "Re: Multiple OSPF keys on Hub and Spoke Frame Relay"
• Next in thread: Arun Arumuganainar: "Re: CAR without excess burst"
• Maybe reply: Arun Arumuganainar: "Re: CAR without excess burst"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 01 2006 - 16:55:40 ART