From: Daniel Fredrick (dfredrick@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Sep 13 2006 - 12:01:36 ART
I could do that, but you only need area 0 when you area talking between two
different areas right?
But yeah the reason why I bring this question up is that every once in
awhile this will happen, where connected routes are not redistributed...
even when they are included in the network statement.
Thanks,
Dan
On 9/13/06, sabrina pittarel <sabri_esame@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Try to make your OSPF area to be area 0
>
>
> Sabrina
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Daniel Fredrick <dfredrick@gmail.com>
> To: sabrina pittarel <sabri_esame@yahoo.com>
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 7:21:56 AM
> Subject: Re: Redistributing ODR and RIP
>
> f0/24 - 204.12.1.7/24
> |
> (sw1)
> \
> \ 173.1.137.0/24
> \
> (R1)
>
> === SW1 config ===
>
> interface FastEthernet0/24
> no switchport
> ip address 204.12.1.7 255.255.255.0
>
> interface Vlan137
> ip address 173.1.137.7 255.255.255.0
>
> router rip
> version 2
> redistribute ospf 1 metric 1
> offset-list 1 in 16 FastEthernet0/24
> network 204.12.1.0
> no auto-summary
>
> access-list 1 permit 0.0.0.0 254.255.255.255
>
> router ospf 1
> redistribute rip subnets
> network 173.1.137.7 0.0.0.0 area 137
>
>
> === R1 config ===
>
> interface FastEthernet0/0
> ip address 173.1.137.1 255.255.255.0
> no shutdown
>
> router ospf 1
> network 173.1.137.1 0.0.0.0 area 137
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> And with this config... the connected routes do not show up on R1...
>
> This is IEWB Vol1Lab17 if that helps.
>
> Thanks,
> Dan
>
>
> On 9/13/06, sabrina pittarel <sabri_esame@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > I really don't understand what you are saying. As far as I know only
> > ISIS and now IPv6 has problem with redistributing between protocols routes
> > that are also connected.
> > RIP doesn't have the problem for sure:
> >
> > Rack1R3#sh run | b router rip
> > router rip
> > version 2
> > network 204.12.1.0
> > no auto-summary
> > !
> > Rack1R3#sh run | b router ospf
> > router ospf 1
> > router-id 150.1.3.3
> > log-adjacency-changes
> > redistribute rip subnets
> > network 149.1.254.3 0.0.0.0 area 0
> > !
> > Remote OSPF router
> >
> > Rack1R4#
> > Rack1R4#sh ip route | i 204.12
> > O E2 204.12.1.0/24 [110/20] via 149.1.254.5, 00:02:41, Serial1/0
> > Rack1R4#
> >
> >
> > ODR is a different story...the hub simply accepts routes from the spoke.
> > These routes are the spoke's stub routes.
> > The network between the hub and the spokes is not a stub network so it
> > won't be included on the ODR routing domain, hence won't be redistributed
> > when you redistribute ODR.
> >
> >
> > Sabrina
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: dfredrick@gmail.com
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 2:39:21 PM
> > Subject: Redistributing ODR and RIP
> >
> > This is probably a very easy question... since it very hard to find.
> >
> > But Why is it when you redistribute RIP into OSPF... or ODR into
> > EIGRP... the connected routes are not redistributed with the redistribute
> > rip or redistribute odr?
> >
> > I can't seem to find any documentation on this... I remember reading
> > something about it. something like... "the router will redistribute whatever
> > the best routes are... so if a route is advertised in a routing protocol,
> > but in the routing table it is show as a connected route... you have to use
> > the redistribute connected command"
> >
> > Something like that... but in effort to speed up my redistribution
> > skills... I am noticing that some protocol will included connected... and
> > some won't
> >
> > Does any one have a good explaination? or a cisco weblink for reference?
> >
> >
> > Thanks for the help.
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 01 2006 - 16:55:40 ART