Re: IS-IS and link failure detection

From: sheherezada@gmail.com
Date: Wed Sep 13 2006 - 11:14:58 ART


Nope, because I might have a switch between the routers, or (even
worse) two switches and the link between them fails.

Mihai

On 9/13/06, Onder Ergun <onderergun@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> How about "carrier-delay 0" under the interface configuration ?
>
>
>
> 2006/9/13, sheherezada@gmail.com <sheherezada@gmail.com>:
> >
> Hi guys,
>
> Let's say that I am asked to minimize the link failure detection time
> with minimal impact on the router's processing power.
>
> I would normally choose BFD, but this is available either on high-end
> platforms either on IOS 12.4. No chance to see this in the real lab.
>
> The other alternative that I am aware of is "isis hello-interval
> minimal", but this does have impact on the processing power (debug
> isis adj-packets just killed my router).
>
> The question is: am I missing something?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mihai Dumitru
> #16616
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 01 2006 - 16:55:40 ART