From: route flap (routeflap@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Sep 06 2006 - 12:14:26 ART
No, No, thanks for the link!!!
I mean it was a silly mistake that I found, just for let you guy know
On 9/6/06, David Timmons <masterdt@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Your right, you don't need to read that link. I am sure the book is too
> full of errors to help. Sorry for the email...
>
> dt
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: route flap <routeflap@gmail.com>
> To: David Timmons <masterdt@yahoo.com>
> Cc: Chris Broadway <midatlanticnet@gmail.com>; Peter Plak <
> plukkie@gmail.com>; Victor Cappuccio <cvictor@protokolgroup.com>; Dusty <
> dustygoody@gmail.com>; David Redfern (AU) <David.Redfern@didata.com.au>;
> Aamir Aziz <aamiraz77@gmail.com>; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2006 9:34:57 AM
> Subject: Re: ICMP Flooding vs SMURF Attack---THE BRIANS AND SCOTT
>
> Hmmmm
>
> From that link
>
> In Example 17-16, ICMP echos and echo replies are limited to 64 kbps of
> bandwidth, with a burst size of 4 kbps of bandwidth. Example 17-17 shows the
> code used on the customer's router.
> Customer(config)# access-list 100 permit icmp any any echo
> Customer(config)# access-list 100 permit icmp any any echo-reply
> Customer(config)# interface serial0
> Customer(config-if)# rate-limit output access-group 100 64000 4000 4000
> conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
>
> the BRUST Size is in BYTESSSSSSSSSS
>
> regards
> RalF
>
>
> On 9/6/06, David Timmons < masterdt@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is Cisco Press link on a book about security. I think it is worth a
> > read. They have some ACL to block your requested post.
> >
> > http://www.ciscopress.com/articles/article.asp?p=345618&seqNum=5&rl=1
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Chris Broadway < midatlanticnet@gmail.com>
> > To: Peter Plak <plukkie@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Victor Cappuccio < cvictor@protokolgroup.com>; Dusty <
> > dustygoody@gmail.com>; David Redfern (AU) <David.Redfern@didata.com.au>;
> > Aamir Aziz < aamiraz77@gmail.com>; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 10:21:24 AM
> > Subject: Re: ICMP Flooding vs SMURF Attack---THE BRIANS AND SCOTT
> >
> >
> > Group,
> >
> > Can we get the "Brians" and/or Scott to give us their opinion on the
> > definitive ACL to log smurf, fraggle, and TCP syn attacks? I think
> > everyone
> > has an opinion but have not heard from the ones I consider to be the
> > most
> > trusted sources.
> >
> > -Broadway
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 01 2006 - 16:55:40 ART