From: Angelo De Guzman (a.deguzman@wesolv.ph.fujitsu.com)
Date: Tue Sep 05 2006 - 05:30:00 ART
Thanks Scott!
But the sh queueing for both command reveals the same values for Discard
Threshold, Dynamic queues and reserved queues. Can you please explain further.
R2#sh run | in policy-map
!
policy-map policy1
class class-default
fair-queue
queue-limit 25
!
R2#sh run int s0/0
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 352 bytes
!
interface Serial0/0
ip address 137.10.45.2 255.255.255.240
ip authentication mode eigrp 100 md5
ip authentication key-chain eigrp 100 EIGRPKEY
encapsulation frame-relay
no dce-terminal-timing-enable
frame-relay map ip 137.10.45.2 204
frame-relay map ip 137.10.45.4 204 broadcast
no frame-relay inverse-arp
service-policy output policy1
end
R2#sh queueing
Current fair queue configuration:
Interface Discard Dynamic Reserved Link Priority
threshold queues queues queues queues
Serial0/0 25 256 256 8 1
Serial0/1 64 256 0 8 1
USING WFQ
!
interface Serial0/0
ip address 137.10.45.2 255.255.255.240
ip authentication mode eigrp 100 md5
ip authentication key-chain eigrp 100 EIGRPKEY
encapsulation frame-relay
no dce-terminal-timing-enable
fair-queue 25 256 256
frame-relay map ip 137.10.45.2 204
frame-relay map ip 137.10.45.4 204 broadcast
no frame-relay inverse-arp
end
R2(config-if)#do sh queueing
Current fair queue configuration:
Interface Discard Dynamic Reserved Link Priority
threshold queues queues queues queues
Serial0/0 25 256 256 8 1
Serial0/1 64 256 0 8 1
USING THE Values that you gave it reveals this.
fair-queue 25 256 0
R2#sh queueing
Current fair queue configuration:
Interface Discard Dynamic Reserved Link Priority
threshold queues queues queues queues
Serial0/0 25 256 0 8 1
Serial0/1 64 256 0 8 1
Scott Morris (9/5/06 4:15 PM):
>
>To be identical, your first command would be "fair-queue 25 256 0"
>
>The last parameter is the number of reserved queues (default = 0).
>
>HTH,
>
>
>Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
>#153, CISSP, et al.
>CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
>IPExpert VP - Curriculum Development
>IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
>smorris@ipexpert.com
>http://www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>Angelo De Guzman
>Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 2:52 AM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: QOS - Simple
>
>Hi,
>
> Is this the same?
>
>1. fair queue 25 256 256
>
>2. policy-map MYPOLICY
> class class-default
> fair-queue
> queue-limit 25
>
>Just want to confirm. If they do how would you call them?
>
>Angelo
>
>
>
>
>
>
>***********************
>No virus was detected in the attachment no filename
>
>Your mail has been scanned by InterScan MSS.
>***********-***********
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>***********************
>No virus was detected in the attachment no filename
>
>Your mail has been scanned by InterScan MSS.
>***********-***********
>
***********************
No virus was detected in the attachment no filename
Your mail has been scanned by InterScan MSS.
***********-***********
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 01 2006 - 16:55:39 ART