From: Alex De Gruiter \(AU\) (Alex.deGruiter@didata.com.au)
Date: Thu Aug 31 2006 - 23:54:18 ART
Using a class-map that matches all traffic is redundant - Cisco is nice
enough to do it for us.
If you have a question that states, for example:
"Ensure that all FTP traffic has a minimum bandwidth guarantee of 64
kbps, and all other traffic is marked with DSCP 0" then I believe that
best practice would be to use the class-default queue.
To satisfy the above criteria, as an example, I would do the following:
class-map match-all FTP
match protocol ftp
policy-map QoS_Outbound
class FTP
Bandwidth 64000
class class-default
set dscp default
int GigabitEthernet 0/0
service-policy output QoS_Outbound
There's no reason to match "all" IP traffic. IOS will do that for us.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
storage4mail
Sent: Friday, 1 September 2006 12:31 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: lab related clarification
QoS related...
Would cisco look for keyword like "class class-default" if it is stated
in a
task to work with "all traffic"?
The reason I am asking this is because such tasks can be completed by
creating a specific class with access-list that permits everything. On
the
other hand if the processing of class-default is differemt that
processing
of any other specific class, then this would be an issue. Your comments
will
hopefully clarify this aspect.
TIA.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 01 2006 - 16:55:39 ART